CC_Minutes_2015_0406 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,April 6,2015 Page 10 familiar to others. Mr. Gupta advised that their staff continued to meet and work with the tenants to whom they provided housing, and printed informational and educational flyers for their use in their specific language. In spite of that, Mr. Gupta noted that adjustments were still difficult as tenants, used to outdoor living, didn't respect not spitting in building common areas or apartments, didn't understand the need for or meaning of window blinds, and often accessed the outdoors through their windows on lower level units by breaking screens out, as well as breaking or unlocking doors. After receiving the preliminary checklist from staff, Mr. Gupta advised that his staff had re-inspected their buildings five times to ensure they were in compliance, and had hired various contractors to go through each and every item inside and outside units to make sure items were taken care of, proven by the amount of funds spent in doing so. As an example, Mr. Gupta noted that they had hired an electrician specifically to test, fix or re- place smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, a very expensive project, but still unfamiliar to tenants who don't understand their function, causing them to disconnect them when ac- tivated from cooking or unplugging C. O. detectors to charge cell phones and then not plugging them back in. Mr. Gupta questioned at what point that became the responsibility of the owner versus the tenant, without being seen as harassing tenants repeatedly to make sure things are working. Mr. Gupta stated that management had attempted to communicate with these low income tenants in their own language, most of who were on state or federal funding, and not valuing the things given to them. Mr. Gupta stated he was unaware of anything ever left undone when reported by a tenant or City staff, and referenced visits from the Fire Marshal who had inspected their build- ing twice and gave it his approval on his last visit. (e.g. fire doors). Mr. Gupta questioned the importance of whether outlets were painted or not and how that became a fire hazard and counted as an infraction. As far as implications about lead paint, Mr. Gupta opined that no one had used lead paint for the last 30-40 years, and the outlets were all function- al. Specific to smoke detectors in each bedroom and also installed in hallways, Mr. Gupta referenced City Code (page 6) stating detectors needed to be located in the vicinity of bedrooms and in sleeping areas, while item #2 addressed sleeping areas other than bed- rooms. Mr. Gupta noted the difficulty in management knowing if a tenant had someone sleeping in the living room. Over the last ten years with Ms. Joshi managing the build- ings on-site, Mr. Gupta questioned how their diligence in managing the buildings. Mr. Gupta opined that there were so many small and petty items mentioned and repeated in the list of violations, he questioned how the Board of anyone in their right minds could determine that small and large items carried the same weight, further opining that it didn't make sense nor did it mean anything to him if there was differentiation between those large and small items.