CC_Minutes_2015_0406 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,April 6, 2015 Page 13 to meet all the requirements and do everything required to maintain the buildings. As the inspector pointed out, Ms. Joshi noted that there were a few things they'd missed, but with tenants living there, things happened as they tried to monitor 227 units with 500 plus tenants and 200 plus kids; and sometimes problems were reported by tenants and some- times not. However, Ms. Joshi assured the Board that as soon as a complaint was re- ceived, it was fixed, but she also didn't think it was acceptable for a tenant to have man- agement in their building or unit every day. Since a fair percentage of tenants don't speak English, Ms. Joshi opined that as long as their stove and refrigerator are working, they didn't care about other issues, but management tried to fix things even if they were tenant responsibilities. Ms. Joshi opined that repeating violations and ignoring their intent to justify a "D" score was not right, referencing the energy saving efforts listed on page 3, and while not a part of the licensing program, she stated their disappointment in not receiving credit for them. In conclusion, Ms. Joshi asked that the Board postpone this license review for six months, even though most things are done, but to allow them to complete outside items; and then having a subsequent inspection in the next few months, and then postponing the next inspection to next year for inside and outside, allowing them to be 100%ready. Ms. Joshi stated that, if there were other things the City wanted them to do, they were willing to do so. Mr. Gupta noted the listing of the banner on the building as a violation, that no one had pointed out previously as being illegal; and also noted one on the building across the street questioning if they had been cited as well. Mr. Gupta further questioned how that was a health or safety issue, and how many of the petty violations listed could have been combined, and also how many of those were related to safety or health. Mr. Gupta ad- vised that his firm prided itself on keeping items legal and safe for their tenants, which was of utmost importance to them. However, Mr. Gupta opined that City staff appeared to be concentrating on smaller, more petting items, even though that was apparently the rules they'd been given to follow. Mr. Gupta further opined that the City needed to de- cide how much weight those petty items should carry, and the weight of the larger items, and the intent of management in their investment in properties to make sure they meet each and every code requirement. In conclusion, Mr. Gupta asked that the City pay closer attention to those code require- ments and hear their appeal to adjust their licensing score accordingly. At the request of Board Member McGehee, Mr. Gupta estimated their immigrant tenant population at approximately 60% over the last 2-3 years, and most minorities with ap- proximately 80% having difficulty speaking English, making it difficult to communicate and often using their young children to translate, making that communication even more difficult and inaccurate.