Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, March 23, 2015 <br /> Page 9 <br /> choices for which commission they preferred to serve on, questioning the ra- <br /> tionale of her colleagues in their appointments. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that the skill sets of his preferred candidates <br /> qualified them from his perspective; expressing his concern in one candidate <br /> about the City's expectations versus a candidate's ability to commit to attending <br /> meetings and deliberate and discuss issues for recommendation to the City Coun- <br /> cil based on their interview comments. Based on those concerns, Councilmember <br /> Willmus stated that he supported candidates Anderson and VanDriest for the Eth- <br /> ics Commission. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed her support and reservations on various can- <br /> didates on attendance as well, along with the ability to obtain a countable vote <br /> versus pushing the City Council's mission and agenda for the various commis- <br /> sions. <br /> Councilmember Etten, specific to the Human Rights Commission, noted his per- <br /> sonal preference for Christiansen based on her international experience and past <br /> leadership and Vincent for her work with immigrant communities in past volun- <br /> teer service as well as in her career. Specific to Ms. Vincent, Councilmember Et- <br /> ten spoke in support of her comments on how to involve people in civic engage- <br /> ment and voting as it correlated with the Commission's work with the citizenship <br /> process, and the life and work skills she could emphasize in the work of the <br /> Commission. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed her same appreciation of her potential work <br /> on the Human Rights Commission but also in general and the contributions she <br /> could make as well as to the Public Works, Environment and Transportation <br /> Commission as another woman on that board. <br /> Sine three candidates expressed multiple interests, Councilmember Laliberte con- <br /> fessed that it had created some difficulty in her decision-making, sine all of the <br /> candidates were good and the points raised by her colleagues were valid. <br /> While not wanting to push the issue, Councilmember Etten expressed his hope <br /> that if not appointed on this round, Ms. Vincent would choose to become involved <br /> in the process again in the future. <br /> Mayor Roe echoed Councilmember Etten, opining that from his point of view, <br /> Ms. Vincent's skill set made her a higher choice for the Human Rights Commis- <br /> sion, creating the dilemma for him in originally suggesting Ms. Christiansen's ap- <br /> pointment to the Community Engagement Commission. Mayor Roe also encour- <br /> aged Ms. Vincent to seek out future vacancies as well. <br />