Laserfiche WebLink
advised that staff anticipated a discussion with the City Council at their April <br /> Work session and was seeking input from the PWETC before that time. <br /> Mr. Schwartz reviewed the background of this program since it was initiated in <br /> the 1970 subsequent to the state-wide burning ban, and noted that Roseville was <br /> one of the only cities in the metropolitan area offering such a service. Mr. <br /> Schwartz further noted the change to a fee-based service in 1998, dramatically <br /> reducing annual participation from approximately 4,500 participants prior to that <br /> time. The City Council has adopted a 2015 fee of$55 per property to fully cover <br /> the cost of the program, Mr. Schwartz advised that the drop in registrations has <br /> occurred at the same time we are seeing an increase in residential use of the City's <br /> recycling site. <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted that among the challenges with and costs of the program <br /> include weather due to short window available for the services, typically three <br /> weeks, while requiring having sufficient resources available to stay on schedule. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that this requires most of the street division staff in addition <br /> to temporary labor for clean-up raking; and in some years making it difficult to <br /> meet customer expectations based on those challenges. <br /> Regarding the decline in participants from 2000 to 2014, Mr. Schwartz reported <br /> that it had been reduced from 2,313 registered users to 694 users. Mr. Schwartz <br /> noted that there was an impact to the City's stormwater system if leaves are not <br /> disposed of properly, but advised that residents were finding alternatives to the <br /> City's leaf pickup program. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that total program costs for 2014 were $88,696 with 694 <br /> participants, or approximately 7% of the City's single-family residents; with <br /> $39,325 in user fees collected. For 2014, Mr. Schwartz advised that the total cost <br /> required a significant storm utility subsidy due to bad weather. <br /> Discussion included the cost of the program defined by the number of <br /> participants, as well as administrative and preparation costs, and the need to <br /> increase fees as the number of users decreases to cover actual costs of the <br /> program (e.g. equipment). <br /> Further discussion included City Code violation for leaves raked onto City streets; <br /> whether or not more leaves ended up in the wastewater system from leaving them <br /> on boulevards while waiting for pickup and depending on weather conditions. <br /> At the request of Chair Stenlund, Mr. Schwartz advised that staff had not yet <br /> determined the demographics (e.g. elderly residents) using the program and <br /> whether or not they would be significantly impacted if the program were <br /> eliminated. Mr. Schwartz did advise that staff had observed that typical smaller <br /> and less treed lots did not use the program as much as those larger area lots with <br /> more trees. <br /> Page 3 of 17 <br />