My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0511_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0511_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 2:33:31 PM
Creation date
5/7/2015 1:57:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department Ap roval <br />� �� �- <br />��� <br />� <br />REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />Agenda Date: OS/11/2015 <br />Agenda Item: 14.e <br />City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Request by the Community Development Department to approve the <br />Roseville Environmental Review Worksheet rela�ed to the HR LLC (TPI <br />Hospitality) project at 2750 Cleveland Avenue <br />BACKGROUND <br />. On December 8, 2014, the City Council approved the Roseville Environmental Review <br />2 Worksheet (ERW) as the replacement for the voluntary Environmental Assessment Worksheet <br />3 (EAW) process that was previously required for all projects within the Twin Lakes <br />� Redevelopment Area. The ERW is similar to the EAW in its provision of project details and <br />� environmental considerations and is administered by the Planning Division. <br />� On March 11, 2015, the Planning Division received the HR LLC (TPI Hospitality) ERW related <br />� to the hotel developments at 2750 Cleveland Avenue (Attachment A). The ERW was emailed to <br />.. appropriate staff at the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS), Minnesota Pollution Control <br />9 Agency (MPCA), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and the Ramsey County <br />� o Traffic Engineer. <br />�� DNR and FWS replied that they had no comment after their review of the ERW. The Ramsey <br />� 2 County Traffic Engineer commented that the County's main concern is the proposed right <br />�.� in/right out access to Cleveland Avenue and that County representatives have met with the <br />�� developer and have denied access to Cleveland Avenue. Therefore, page 4 of the Environmental <br />� 5 Review Document should reflect the access denial. The MPCA provided a review similar in <br />�� nature to an EAW review (Attachment B) and asked for more general information and/or <br />�? clarification. The MPCA did not request additional environmental analysis or investigation. <br />�g The project is still required to proceed through the appropriate MPCA environmental clean-up <br />�.� approval process. Other comments from the MPCA were alerting the applicant to requirements <br />2� related to storm water treatment and erosion control that will be addressed by the City Engineer <br />2 � and the Rice Creek Watershed through the approval of construction plans. <br />2.2 Given the comments from the MPCA, the City Planner requested the applicant respond to a <br />23 number of the MPCA comments; those responses are attached (Attachment C). <br />2=: PLANNING DIVISION RECOMMENDATION <br />2.� Per Resolution 11198 the City Council is required to approve the ERW in order to allow staff to <br />2� issue permits related to the project. Since none of the agencies contacted have indicated a need <br />2� for additional environmental review and identified no significant issues, the Planning Division is <br />2� recommending that the City Council acknowledge the information provided in the HR LLC (TPI <br />2� Hospitality) ERW and the applicant's response to the MPCA's comments meet this requirement, <br />3o thus allowing staff to begin the process of issuing permits related to the project. <br />3i <br />PF14-29 2750Cleveland RCA ERW OS1115.doc <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.