My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0511_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0511_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 2:33:31 PM
Creation date
5/7/2015 1:57:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit <br />and�or alternative transportation modes. <br />1 j The existing parking spaces were 0, the additional parking spaces are 190. <br />2) See completed traffic study <br />3) See completed traffic study <br />4) See completed traffic study <br />5j 5ee completed traffic study <br />B. Discuss the effect an traffic congestian on affected roads and describe any traffic <br />improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project's impact on the regional <br />transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily <br />trip exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared even if an EAW is not required. Use <br />the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOTj <br />Access Management Manual, Chapter 5(available at: <br />http: f,/www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement,/resources.htrnl or a similar local guidance, <br />Refer to the traffic study. <br />C. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation <br />effects. <br />Refer to the traffic study. <br />NOTE: The City may require a traffic study to satisfy compliance with this section. Please contact <br />the Roseville City Engineer for further guidance. <br />Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation (such as a glare <br />from intensive lights, lights visible form wilderness areas or city park(s�, and large visible plums of <br />cooling tawers or exhaust stakes) explain here. <br />No nan-routine visua) impacts are anticipated. <br />18. Curnvla#i�re poten�ie�l effec#s <br />A. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects <br />that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. <br />There are no other knawn adverse environmental impacts. <br />B. Describe any reasonably forseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been <br />laidj that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic <br />scales and timeframes identified above. <br />There are no known future projects. <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.