Laserfiche WebLink
May 6, 2015 <br />Page 4 of 1 1 <br />9. WATER USE <br />MPCA Comment: Given that the historical land use of the site was a farmstead and then a <br />strawberry�raspberry farm, it is entirely possible that a water well (and an old septic system) may be <br />located on the property. The Minnesota Department of Health should be contacted to determine if there <br />are any records of a well having been located on the property or sealed. <br />ROSEVILLE's Comment: Provide any well information that you have or that site will be inspected prior to <br />construction for well. <br />RAMAKER Comment: Prior to construction, a site inspection will be completed to identify the potential <br />for remaining wells on the site. In addition, Minnesota Department of Health will be contacted for <br />records of past or present wells. Any unsealed wells will be properly abandoned prior to construction. <br />It is presumed that all monitoring wells associated with previous environmental investigations were <br />abandoned in accordance with local and state requirements. <br />1 1 A. & B. GEOLOGY, SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY/LAND FORMS <br />MPCA Comment: The ��Subsurface Geotechnical Investigation" should be summarized here to reflect the <br />information requested in these sections. <br />ROSEVILLE's Comment: Provide brief summary of geotechnical report. <br />RAMAKER Comment: In response to the 1 1 A. & 1 1 B., please find the following response. Note, the <br />questions from the "Environmental Review Worksheet Application & Process" have been italicized <br />(below). The response language, following the application questions, was extracted from the <br />"Subsurface Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Hotel Buildings", dated January 21, 2015 by <br />Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc. <br />1 1 A. - Geology: Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible <br />geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined�shallow aquifers, or karst <br />conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have <br />on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic <br />features. <br />1 1 B. - Soils and Topography: Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and <br />descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to <br />erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. <br />Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and�or grading. Discuss impacts from project <br />activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. <br />Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, <br />soil corrections or other measures. Erosion�sedimentation control related to storm water runoff should be <br />addressed in response to Item 9.B.ii. <br />RESPONSE: <br />The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon interpreted results of boring <br />logs, their relation to the planned work, and other information. Because the borings represent a <br />small portion of the site in relation to the proposed area of work, ongoing review of construction <br />should be carried out. If excavations reveal subsurface soils of a different nature than those <br />observed in the borings or if the location or elevations or type of the planned work are altered <br />significantly, the Soils Engineer should be contacted for possibly revised recommendations (see <br />#6 below and the following "Limitations of Investigation"). <br />1. General Site Suitabilitv: <br />Based upon interpreted results of the borings, if appears fhat fhe site has minimal <br />limitations regarding suitability for construction. These mainly consist of the presence of <br />some surficial unsuitable soil, an area where there are some low penetration value/wet <br />soils in the upper zones that may have to be subcut out, the tendency for the site to perch <br />water and the need to adapt the site in general for the intended use. These limitations are <br />correctable by adequate site correction design, foundation engineering and further <br />monitoring of soils as construction proceeds. <br />