My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0511_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0511_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 2:33:31 PM
Creation date
5/7/2015 1:57:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 6, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 1 1 <br />Excavated organic material, uncontrolled fill, wet unstable soil or other soil contaminated <br />with topsoil, vegetation, etc., should be disposed of offsite, or in landscaping areas, where <br />the bearing of weight will not be required. There appears to be some opportunity fo salvage <br />mineral site soil for re-use as controlled fill as some of it, from the southeasfierly area, will be <br />sandy, although with a considerable fines confenf and a high sfandard maximum density. <br />But, the volume will likely be minimal. Other excavated soil will be suitable (organic, over <br />moist or saturated, etc.). Some material for controlled fill placement will have to be imported. <br />Refer to subsequent sections for more detailed and specific recommendations for site <br />correction recommendations for each structural component. <br />3. Foundations: <br />For purposes of proposed construction, foundations and fill to support foundations must rest <br />upon and over mineral (non-organic) soils of adequate bearing value. As indicated earlier, a <br />bearing capacity of 3000 pounds per square foot (psf) has been targeted oon a preliminary <br />basis. <br />This analysis of soil for foundation purposes is based upon the locations, designs <br />configuration and likely grades indicated above. If there is any significant deviation from <br />any assumptions indicated herein, then these recommendations may have to be reconsidered. <br />If the site is prepared as outlines in #2 above, removing unsuitable soil, performing further <br />excavations as necessary, controlling any water that may enter the excavation and placing <br />controlled fill as necessary, then perimeter footings for the northwest building may be generally <br />designed allowing 3000 psf foundation bearing capacity. This values is recommended on fhe <br />basis of the facfi that foofings will rest upon either naturally occurring mineral soil wifh high <br />penefration values or upon well compacted fill, and wifh any detected softer zones wifihin <br />"one footing width" of footings removed (see above discussion regarding the vicinity of <br />Borings 4& 5). For the southeast building a slightly higher value of 3500 psf may be used <br />due to greater confidence in soils here, especially in that none of the thin zones of wet softer <br />soil were found. Interior pad footings, owing to their square configuration and larger size, <br />and with a minimum of 1'/z feet of confinement, may be designed allowing 3500 psf <br />foundation bearing capacity. Interior strip footings 2 feet wide or greater, again with a <br />minimum of 1'/z foot of confinement, may be designed allowing 2500 psf foundation <br />bearing capacity. These interior bearing capacities could be increased by increasing <br />confinement (i.e. lowering footings), buf only after consulfiation with fhe soils engineer. All <br />of the allowable bearing capacities recommendation take infio account shear failure potential <br />near footing levels and fihe nature of deeper soil regarding settlement potenfiial. <br />Fill, as required, should be placed, compacted, and tested as per the "Fill Placement" (#5) <br />section following. Note that a compaction level of 98% of Standard Maximum Density is <br />recommended. This applies to interior confining soils as well. The above should provide a <br />factor of safety against foundation failure of approximately 3. Over-all and differential <br />settlements should be less than '/s" and '/a", respectively. If footing conditions change from <br />what has been assumed herein, further study and analysis would be necessary. <br />If the site is graded to different levels than assumed above, if fhe fype of building proposed <br />changes or if soils of a significanfily different nature are discovered during excavafions, the <br />Soils Engineer should be contacted for re-analysis and possibly revised recommendations. <br />It is not recommended to place footings upon or over organic soil or any unsuitable soil or to <br />deviate from recommendations contained herein as shear failure of footings or excessive <br />differential settlement of the structure could result. <br />4. Slabs: <br />Slabs and fill to support slabs should also rest upon and over mineral soil of adequate <br />density fo resisf settlement. Based upon boring evidence, base mineral soils on the site, with <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.