CC_Minutes_2015_0504 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, May 4,2015 Page 11 Willmus moved, McGehee seconded, directing the Community Development staff to abate the public nuisance violations at 2560 Fry Street by hiring general con- tractors to correct the site violations as previously noted, if not corrected by the property owner by June 20, 2015, at an estimated cost of$20,000; with the prop- erty owner to be billed for actual and administrative costs, and if charges not paid, authorizing staff to recover costs as specified in City Code, Section 407.07B. Being aware of some area youth accessing the vacant building, Councilmember Laliberte expressed her interest in making sure the larger holes in the building were addressed prior to more park traffic occurs this spring. Councilmember Laliberte stated she was not interested in having children exploring the building and/or site. Roll Call Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, and Roe. Nays: None. 15. Business Items—Presentations/Discussions 7:00 pm a. Twin Lakes Discussion— Community Mixed Use (CMU) Zoning Designation Uses BENCH HANDOUT—Land Use Table Worksheet (updated from RCA) Community Development Director Paul Bilotta provided an overview of the pro- posed Twin Lakes discussion timeline showing major anticipated milestones based on previous discussions. Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd advised that he had put together an updated table as the next step in this process to review specific land uses and regulatory issues for the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area as described in detail in the RCA dated May 4, 2015. At the request of Mayor Roe, staff displayed a revised subarea map overview of subareas as identified through the recent public input processes. Mr. Lloyd noted the values coming out of the public process entered on the table, and their specific application of negative, positive or neutral values for each pro- posed use, suggesting those uses that could be permitted or not permitted, or per- mitted through a Conditional Use (CU) process. Mr. Lloyd admitted that there were a lot of neutral values that were difficult to distinguish, and therefore staff had developed a five-point scale, shown in the table legend grouping those values and differentials for each use. Mr. Lloyd noted that Subarea 4 was the subject of the citizen petition received earlier this year for moving zoning designation to medium density residential (MDR). Mr. Lloyd advised that the process in grouping variously valued areas had led to some similarities in subareas, leading staff to group them in this way. Mr. Lloyd