My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0504
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:09:19 PM
Creation date
5/21/2015 12:23:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/4/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 4, 2015 <br /> Page 25 <br /> Without objection, Mayor Roe concluded that this remain a P use under CU in all <br /> Subareas. <br /> Industrial: Manufacturing <br /> Industrial: Warehouse <br /> With little discussion and without objection, Mayor Roe concluded that this re- <br /> mains an NP use in all Subareas for both categories. <br /> Office: All Categories (Clinic, Medical, Dental, Optical, Corporate Headquarters, <br /> General, Office Showroom) <br /> Mayor Roe noted the only change from current status to the 2014 proposed use <br /> was to NP Office Showroom, with it being P in all other Office/Business Park and <br /> other Commercial Districts. <br /> Councilmember Willmus suggested permitting the Office Showroom use as well. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte questioned the rationale in arriving at a NP use in pre- <br /> vious conversations; with Mayor Roe suggesting it perhaps never got to the dis- <br /> cussion point at that time. <br /> Without objection, Mayor Roe concluded that uses remain P across the board in <br /> all Subareas. <br /> Residential in General <br /> Mayor Roe asked staff if there were any projections or proposals from them at <br /> this time on how to break down Multi-Family within use tables depending on spe- <br /> cific zoning codes. <br /> Mr. Bilotta advised that it was broken down for questioning, and as an example, <br /> multi-family was just that, no matter the considerable amount of emotion sur- <br /> rounding it. Mr. Bilotta stated that some are fine with condominium housing, but <br /> not with Section 8 housing, and based on Fair Housing Laws, the City was not al- <br /> lowed to pick apart or slice individual multi-family housing types. and the only <br /> option was to control whether or not there were owner-occupied or not, with no <br /> other levels of control. <br /> Mayor Roe noted the need to also control the height limitations for multi-family <br /> and other use types adjacent to single-family residential areas. <br /> Residential/Family: Multi-family <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that Mr. Bilotta touched on this as well and the <br /> difficulty in getting into conversations for market rate, workforce, Section 8 or <br /> other housing based on the underlying use. Councilmember Willmus noted that <br /> someone could walking the door seeking dollars for market rate housing, and 2-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.