My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0504
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:09:19 PM
Creation date
5/21/2015 12:23:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/4/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 4,2015 <br /> Page 30 <br /> Regarding the bridge parcels previously discussed tonight between Subarea B on <br /> the west side and the east side along County Road C, Mayor Roe questioned if <br /> there was a desire by the body to change the strip or leave as staff originally dis- <br /> played. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined it should be left open "to be determined" for <br /> now. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte sought to go on record to state that she was not in sup- <br /> port of that Subarea progress as far north as staff's dotted line on the map indicat- <br /> ed. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated she was not totally committed to her original <br /> proposal tonight in any strong way. <br /> Mayor Roe thanked staff for their assistance and suggested further thought and <br /> feedback be considered prior to a decision on this bridge area. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Lisa McCormick <br /> Ms. McCormick opined that she was in essence seeing a disregard by the City <br /> Council in requests from its residents and simply moving current HDR zoning to <br /> CMU. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred that the City Council was proposing CMU zoning for Sub- <br /> area 4 of the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area, as originally suggested in 2014. <br /> Ms. McCormick stated she found this very disappointing, opining that she would <br /> have much appreciated a discussion of heights as part of this. Form her recollec- <br /> tion of residential survey results and her discussions with Mr. Bilotta, indications <br /> were not in favor of multi-family housing in the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Ar- <br /> ea, and if considered at all it would only be in Subarea B, even though she was <br /> now seeing it as being a P use. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that it was a P use with conditional uses applied; with Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus concurring. <br /> Ms. McCormick stated that she had an issue with multi-family in Subarea C, <br /> south of Terrace Drive, and reiterated the example with her property and how far <br /> noise and odors actually travelled, with 750' not actually being that far from sin- <br /> gle-family homes. Ms. McCormick expressed further concern with limited pro- <br /> duction and processing uses, formerly NP and suggested for change tonight by the <br /> City Council to a P use, even after hearing people speak in opposition to that. If <br /> the neighborhood could be assured that the uses would be restricted to office and <br /> clean rooms, Ms. McCormick stated they would be somewhat relieved. However, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.