My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0504
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:09:19 PM
Creation date
5/21/2015 12:23:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/4/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Original Message <br /> From: Bryan Lloyd <br /> Sent: Monday,June 01, 2015 2:45 PM <br /> To: Pat Trudgeon; Kari Collins <br /> Subject: May 4 Council minutes <br /> Pat and Kari, <br /> As I was updating my table of land uses being discussed in the Twin Lakes area, I used the minutes and <br /> the video to triple-check(as it were) my notations in that table during the Council's discussion on May 4. <br /> If I'm not misunderstanding the archived video, I think the minutes have the wrong "without objection, <br /> Mayor Roe concluded..." in a few places. Specifically, <br /> Fast food: I believe that the Council agreed that they were generally open to drive-throughs as <br /> conditional uses for banks, pharmacies, and so on, throughout the area, and they didn't have any <br /> objection to permitting fast food restaurants in any location that don't have drive-throughs. And they all <br /> agreed that fast food restaurants with drive-throughs should be prohibited everywhere. The minutes <br /> suggest to me that fast food drive-throughs can be allowed as conditional uses up by the residential <br /> neighborhood and maybe along Fairview Avenue, but not behind Byerly's or by Walmart. My solution <br /> during the discussion was to modify the table to show"fast food" as permitted in any location and to <br /> show"fast food with drive-through" as not permitted in any location, and as the Council was talking <br /> about how to summarize their preference Member Etten commented that my fix in the table did the <br /> trick. <br /> Multi-family residential: The minutes indicate that the Council decided that multi-family developments <br /> should be permitted in all locations, but I'm pretty certain that they settled on such developments being <br /> conditional uses in all locations. <br /> Assisted living: the mistake is pretty easily seen, here.The first line of the minutes of this part of the <br /> discussion indicates that assisted living is a conditional use everywhere and that no change is being <br /> discussed, but the last line "confirms" that it's simply a permitted (rather than conditional) use in all <br /> locations. <br /> I don't know exactly what fix is necessary, if any, but the discrepancies could be important if people are <br /> keeping score at home. <br /> Bryan Lloyd <br /> Senior Planner <br /> City of Roseville <br /> (651) 792-7073 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.