Laserfiche WebLink
264 <br />increased minimally, Mr. Goodwin noted that the Eureka residual rate remained <br />265 <br />the envy of other single -sort facilities across the country. <br />266 <br />267 <br />Unfortunately, Mr. Goodwin noted that the revenue share continued to trend <br />268 <br />down and reviewed how and why materials are worth less than they were three <br />269 <br />years ago, based on commodities, their market prices, and impacts to those <br />270 <br />commodities. <br />271 <br />272 <br />As the PWETC considered options for future fieldtrips, Mr. Goodwin encouraged <br />273 <br />them to visit Eureka's MRF or glass separation fa ' ' S. <br />274 <br />275 <br />At the request of Member Wozniak, Mr. Goodwin reviewed how their firm was <br />276 <br />able to measure total tonnage at routes and lists of stops at single-family and/or <br />277 <br />multi -family properties, based on the number of carts tipped at each site, cart <br />278 <br />weights and amounts as distributed among buildings. <br />279 <br />280 <br />While multi -family properties are unique, Mr. Goodwin reviewed how the driver <br />281 <br />measured those carts before tipping them, monitoring each building, and <br />282 <br />continued to seek more efficient ways to track that tonnage beyond current <br />283 <br />practices. However, Mr'. Goodwin noted how essential this type of information <br />284 <br />was as a tool to provide historical information on collections and properties from <br />285 <br />the previous year. <br />286 <br />287 <br />Chair Stenlund suggested some type of contest for multi -family properties to <br />288 <br />incentivize them to recycle, especially those showing significant drops from the <br />289 <br />previous year. <br />290 <br />IIL <br />291 Mr. Goodwin concurred with such an incentive program; noting the need to find <br />292 out how and why trends are fluctuating at specific buildings to address those <br />293 needs. <br />294 <br />295 Chair Stenlund n Nps request to address a way to provide recycling at <br />296 construction site for g. water bottles from workers); with Mr. <br />297 Goodwin remembering that request, but recognizing the unfortunate logistical <br />298 issues inv ed in such a system. <br />299 <br />300 Mr. Goodwin ureka's observation of last year's Rosefest to monitor events <br />301 and their plan to ork with Rotary in 2015 to make this large city event a zero <br />302 waste event, providing another example to Roseville residents and others of the <br />303 intent of the City of Roseville to lead recycling efforts. <br />304 <br />305 Member Cihacek noted dramatic drops indicated in municipal buildings in <br />306 Roseville (e.g. fire station) and asked if there was some variable that accounted <br />307 for that; and why the City's policy about recycling at the city level was not <br />308 tracking as well as residential recycling. <br />309 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />