Laserfiche WebLink
previous feedback received to-date; criteria used in determining which is <br /> appropriate based on traffic volumes and/or conditions or limited rights-of-way <br /> available; differences in areas with a dedicated funding source and others worked <br /> into road projects as available. <br /> Chair Stenlund noted his difficulty in determining ranking based on whether there <br /> was dedicated funding in place or anticipated; whether or not to take larger or <br /> smaller segments; and how to rank them accordingly if tied to other projects with <br /> a funding source. If revisiting his ranking, Chair Stenlund admitted that he may <br /> not rank it the same again; and noted other individual PWETC members had <br /> different agendas as well, making it difficult to come to a consensus on the <br /> ranking. <br /> Mr. Culver encouraged individual members to go to the City's website and search <br /> for the Master Plan, as adopted in 2008, to begin their review of what went into <br /> the background of the Plan and how priorities were established. Mr. Culver noted <br /> current development (e.g. motels being developed in the Twin Lakes area that will <br /> incorporated a sidewalk along Cleveland Avenue) that will help the City achieve <br /> its goals. <br /> 9. Possible Items for Next Meeting—May 26, 2015 <br /> • Chair Stenlund noted the annual NPDES/1\4S4 Report at the May meeting <br /> • Solar Update (Cihacek) <br /> • BRT Project (Cihacek) <br /> • Parking Lot Paving (Cihacek) <br /> Member Cihacek suggested this may be an appropriate topic for the PWETC's <br /> joint work session with the City Council <br /> • Transit Accessibility (Lenz) <br /> Member Lenz suggested an overview of this issue, citing Lexington Avenue <br /> buses to the Central Corridor line, and current difficulties in getting from <br /> Roseville to St. Paul, even though getting from Roseville to Minneapolis <br /> wasn't problematic. Member Lenz noted this seemed to be a west versus east <br /> metro issue for transit funding, and sought an update and general overview. <br /> Member Thurnau opined that this seemed to be more of a regional equity <br /> issue related to density and service issues dictated by ridership numbers. <br /> Member Lenz opined that if routes was more convenient, there would be more <br /> ridership, and reiterated her interest in hearing about that equity <br /> Member Cihacek opined that major road closures along transit routes also <br /> were problematic and suggested having a conversation about Roseville and <br /> how they intended to handle that issue. <br /> Page 12 of 13 <br />