Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />Attachment B <br />DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 11, 2015 <br />Page 12 <br />over the next two years. As noted on Attachment A entitled "City of Roseville — <br />Strategic Plan Summary 2016 — 18," Mr. Trudgeon noted the KOI and Targets <br />were broken into different subgroups, with Department and Assistant Department <br />Heads in attendance tonight to speak to each of the areas they'd worked on, even <br />though the entire group had addressed all of the initiatives from an organizational <br />standpoint to determine if they were feasible. While this is only a summary, Mr. <br />Trudgeon expressed staff's excitement in working with the City Council on their <br />direction over the next two years. <br />Mr. Trudgeon suggested, after the City Council had time to provide feedback and <br />further consider the documents and staff's presentation tonight, the draft plan be <br />brought forward at the June 8, 2015 City Council meeting for final consideration <br />and approval. However, Mr. Trudgeon recommended that the City Council re- <br />ceive public input on the draft document at tonight's meeting as well as at the <br />June 8, 2015 meeting. <br />Strate�ic Priorities <br />Effective Governance <br />Staff assigned: City Manager Pat Trudgeon and Fire Chief Tim O'Neill <br />City Manager Trudgeon briefly reviewed the strategic initiatives outlined on At- <br />tachment A for City Council consideration and feedbacic. <br />Councilmember McGehee expressed appreciation for the template idea, recogniz- <br />ing that it would require a lot of work but also provided an automatic guide inter- <br />nally and externally as staff guided changes, or for new people coming into the <br />process. However, Councilmember McGehee questioned how and at what point <br />additional information was provided to the City Council, or how moving from <br />presentation to action was anticipated and in what format it would come forward. <br />Councilmember McGehee expressed her interest in receiving more information <br />sooner rather than later and in advance of a meeting. <br />City Manager Trudgeon responded that the format would depend on the specific <br />topic, whether bringing information forward for a first look as a preliminary <br />presentation and then subsequently for action at a future meeting, either on the <br />Consent Agenda or Business/Action Item, depending on the topic. Mr. Trudgeon <br />noted some initiatives would be mare straightfarward and require ]ess review, <br />while others would be more involved and not as routine in nature. Mr. Trudgeon <br />noted the need for the City Council to make that determination and provide staff <br />with sufficient feedback as to what information they were seeking to be included <br />on future RCA's depending on the particular topic. <br />Councilmember Willmus expressed appreciation for City Manager Trudgeon's <br />comments, opining that often staff looked at issues differently than the City <br />Council, but at the end of the day the elected body was accountable to the voters. <br />Councilmember Willmus noted that this often created a messy, sloppy process <br />needing to be muddled through. However, Councilmember Willmus opined that <br />