Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 11,2015 <br /> Page 23 <br /> forts recently implemented, Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff was now in a better <br /> position with time and resources to get everyone on board eventually. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, City Manager Trudgeon responded <br /> that it was the goal to have everyone on board and organized by the end of 2016. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that it was a goal, while recognizing work efforts would and <br /> could shift as well. <br /> In his previous discussions with Finance Director Miller, Mayor Roe noted one <br /> challenge may be to link the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) document to the <br /> infrastructure management and financial tracking documents, as well as getting <br /> the park program into that CIP system allowing them to show on the same report. <br /> While understanding it was just a spreadsheet that needed to be managed through <br /> some expertise, Mayor Roe expressed his desire to be able to track infrastructure <br /> with CIP dollars to make sure the money set aside in Enterprise Fund areas was <br /> the right amount and being spent in a timelyfashion, or if it needed reallocated <br /> elsewhere. If tracked well and dollars clearly identified, Mayor Roe opined that <br /> the City Council may be able to look at rates and only address inflationary pieces <br /> for a few years without continuing to adjust those rates. However, until known <br /> for sure, Mayor Roe noted the difficulty in tracking that information. <br /> Conclusion <br /> City Manager Trudgeon, in conclusion noted that this was the point where staff <br /> exited the process and this draft became a City Council working document. Mr. <br /> Trudgeon stated the reason for tonight's presentation was to populate ideas on <br /> how to achieve priorities and KOI, and various targets. While appreciating feed- <br /> back so far, Mr. Trudgeon suggested the need for the City Council to determine <br /> its comfort level and how to express their various components. Mr. Trudgeon <br /> clarified that staff was reliant on the City Council saying what they wanted to do <br /> and how to do so; and suggested if something didn't make sense or a change was <br /> needed to a previously-stated KOI, they provide that additional feedback. Mr. <br /> Trudgeon further clarified that the strategic initiatives on the summary plan were <br /> only intended as suggestions from staff to begin discussions, and in the meantime, <br /> he sought additional feedback from the City Council before bringing the docu- <br /> ment back on June 8, 2015. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted several areas that would benefit from feedback <br /> from the CEC or HRC; and questioned how City Manager Trudgeon saw that fit- <br /> ting into the timeline for City Council action proposed for June 8, 2015. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon stated that was entirely up to the City Council, whether <br /> they wanted additional time for vetting or discussion, even though staff was eager <br /> to begin work on some of the initiatives if directed to do so. If the plan changes, <br />