Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 11,2015 <br /> Page 29 <br /> without first talking to the CEC, noting the commissions and general public were <br /> part of the process, not only staff. <br /> Using Councilmember McGehee's recent issue related to garbage collection, in <br /> order to come up with ways to engage the community from the ground up versus <br /> from the top down, Mr. Grefenberg opined that the community outreach aspect <br /> needed more fleshing out and determine what was meant. Mr. Grefenberg ex- <br /> pressed his unwillingness to be part of a commission that came in after the fact <br /> and rubber stamped what staff had put together. While it was within the City <br /> Council's authority to proceed, Mr. Grefenberg encouraged them to not only talk <br /> the talk but walk the path of civic engagement and seek more input from commis- <br /> sions and the public. Mr. Grefenberg further opined that another format was <br /> needed beyond that provided by this type of public comment opportunity. Mr. <br /> Grefenberg suggested that the City Council meet with advisory commissions as <br /> they had already done with staff 3-4 times; and asked that the Mayor and City <br /> Manager meet with the CEC rather than have the staff liaison to the CEC serve in <br /> that role, since he hadn't been present for any of these discussions. <br /> Sharon Sanders,363 S McCarron's Blvd. <br /> Ms. Sanders also noted her status as a citizen not a customer; and agreed with <br /> previous speakers and Councilmember Willmus on the need to push the time back <br /> and seek public feedback as well as have six month reviews moving forward. <br /> Ms. Sanders noted her attendance at the Planning Retreat and hearing the City <br /> Council and staff state their desire for community engagement. However, Ms. <br /> Sanders opined there appeared to be confusion city-wide about the definition of <br /> civic and community engagement. Ms. Sanders advised that she had joined the <br /> CEC because she wanted to help, and thought at least they would be reviewing <br /> this strategic plan. Ms. Sanders asked for that time to allow the CEC to review <br /> the plan and offer their suggestions before adoption. Since the draft notes are <br /> public, Ms. Sanders agreed with the suggestion of Mr. Grefenberg, that citizens be <br /> given time to become aware of the discussions and in the interest of community <br /> engagement, see what feedback was forthcoming toward that cultural change. <br /> Donna Spencer, 2267 Laurie Road <br /> As a recent, three-year resident of Roseville, formerly living in St. Paul and Min- <br /> neapolis, Ms. Spencer admitted she had not read this report in full yet, but sought <br /> the opportunity to do so. In agreement with previous speakers, Ms. Spencer <br /> opined it would be ideal to provide the CEC and Task Forces serving under the <br /> commission to review this document and provide their feedback and comments, <br /> further opining that there was already work underway in those groups that could <br /> serve to improve the document. <br /> Ms. Spencer also agreed with the sentiment for giving the public a chance to re- <br /> view the strategic plan and have advisory commissions meet with the City Coun- <br />