My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0615
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2015 4:08:23 PM
Creation date
6/25/2015 3:59:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/15/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 15, 2015 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Councilmember Etten echoed some of the comments of Councilmember Willmus <br /> regarding park dedication fees, opining that while lot lines may not change, new <br /> density may occur, and questioned how park dedication worked into that type of <br /> redevelopment. Councilmember Etten suggested legal counsel may need to <br /> weigh in about how and when those fees may kick in as Roseville continued to <br /> redevelop. <br /> Regarding the club house at Cedarholm Golf Course, Councilmember Etten <br /> agreed that the current building was in rough shape with continued deferral of <br /> roof maintenance on the CIP depending on the future of the facility. However, <br /> Councilmember Etten opined it may prove another positive situation, and while <br /> the Commission reviews its future, may also prove a positive asset as a year- <br /> round facility for community use. <br /> Regarding whether or not to incorporate it in the General Fund or continue opera- <br /> tions as a separate Enterprise Fund, Councilmember Etten recognized the cross- <br /> purposes of staff and difficulty in sorting revenue and expenses out accordingly. <br /> Given that consideration, Councilmember Etten opined that it made sense to make <br /> that operation part of the broader community offerings versus a separate Enter- <br /> prise Fund, such as License Center operations with staff dedicated specifically <br /> and only to that particular effort. <br /> Councilmember Etten clarified discussion about the two parcels in SW Roseville, <br /> noting that one parcel was not actually for sale and the owner was not interested <br /> in selling, and potential acquisition of the other parcel fell through when a differ- <br /> ent offer had been received. As a former Chair of the Commission, Councilmem- <br /> ber Etten noted the positive advances made, particularly in the recent completion <br /> of the path along County Road B. Councilmember Etten also clarified that there <br /> already existed a shared agreement with the City of Falcon Heights and that a pos- <br /> itive collaboration was in place and continued to be part of the process for ongo- <br /> ing improvement for the SW area of Roseville. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte thanked the Commission for their work to-date, recog- <br /> nizing it had been a busy few years for them, requiring lots of oversight for staff <br /> and the Commission on the various Renewal Program projects. As a recent par- <br /> ticipant of one of the Playground Build projects, Councilmember Laliberte stated <br /> she highly recommended it for resident involvement. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte spoke in support of those areas of focus laid out by the <br /> Commission in their report, and encouraged them to continue their out-of-the-box <br /> thinking for each of those work plan initiatives, and to not limit themselves to a <br /> particular piece of land in SW Roseville but to consider all options. Coun- <br /> cilmember Laliberte shared the public safety concerns for Tamarack Park, opining <br /> it needed to be addressed on a number of different levels. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.