My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0615
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2015 4:08:23 PM
Creation date
6/25/2015 3:59:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/15/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 15, 2015 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked Commissioner Doneen regarding properties still <br /> available in SW Roseville. <br /> Commissioner Doneen responded that, for various reasons, the Commission chose <br /> not to move forward on either of the two available properties at this time. <br /> Chair Stoner concurred, noting that one parcel was more favorable than the other <br /> given its size and how it was laid out based on what could be fit on either parcel <br /> (e.g. ballfields). <br /> Councilmember McGehee clarified that, when she considered a park in her area, <br /> she was not specifically considering its use as a ballfield, but green space to pro- <br /> vide an opportunity for family activities, not necessarily organized or formal ac- <br /> tivities. Councilmember McGehee opined that there were many such amenities <br /> available in the community. <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested the Commission's consideration of partner- <br /> ing with the City of Falcon Heights with their community park already in that area <br /> and providing many amenities, and already used by a majority of SW Roseville <br /> residents already. Given the recent completion and integration of the pathway, <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed her preference for that partnership option <br /> versus acquiring more land; and asked that the Commission think more broadly <br /> and make links with neighboring communities. <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked Commissioner Becker-Finn about how a deter- <br /> mination was made for those paying fees (e.g. civic or neighborhood groups) and <br /> private uses. Councilmember McGehee provided a recent anecdotal example of <br /> apparent disparities, and her understanding of the intent for building use by resi- <br /> dents. <br /> As a newer member of the Commission, Commissioner Becker-Finn advised that <br /> she was not on board when fees were determined. <br /> Chair Stoner provided the fee structure and intent for use of buildings by resi- <br /> dents, considering use by resident groups as a loss and theoretically compensated <br /> with non-resident fees. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Commissioner O'Brien clarified that <br /> the fees depended on the function and how the event is defined — whether exclu- <br /> sive to a particular association or open to the public. <br /> Commissioner Stoner noted this is the general intent, and obviously each case was <br /> given consideration. <br />■ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.