Laserfiche WebLink
P <br />ROPOSAL <br />6 <br />Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC)proposes to demolish the decommissioned <br />7 <br />fire stationand replat the property into 18lotsfor development of one-family, attached and <br />8 <br />detached townhomes.Theproposedpreliminary plat documentation isincluded with this report <br />9 <br />as Attachment C. <br />10 <br />When exercising theso-called “quasi-judicial” authorityon a platrequest,the role of the City is <br />11 <br />to determine the facts associated with a particular request and apply those facts to the legal <br />12 <br />standards contained in the ordinance and relevant state law. In general, if the facts indicate the <br />13 <br />applicationmeets the relevant legal standards and will not compromise the public health, safety <br />14 <br />and general welfare, then the applicant islikely entitled to the approval. The City is, however, <br />15 <br />able to add conditions to a plat approval to ensure that the likely impacts toparks, schools,roads, <br />16 <br />storm sewers, and other public infrastructure on and around the subject property are adequately <br />17 <br />addressed.Subdivisions may also be modified to promote the public health, safety, and general <br />18 <br />welfare, and to provide for the orderly, economic, and safe development of land, and to promote <br />19 <br />housing affordability for all levels. <br />20 <br />An applicant seeking approval of a plat of this size is required to hold an open house meeting to <br />21 <br />inform the surrounding property owners and other interested individuals of the proposal, to <br />22 <br />answer questions, and to solicit feedback. The open house for this application was held on May <br />23 <br />14, 2015;the brief summary of the open house meeting provided by the applicant is included <br />24 <br />with this staff report as Attachment D. <br />25 <br />PPA <br />RELIMINARY LATNALYSIS <br />26 <br />As a preliminary platof a residential subdivision, the proposal is subject to the minimum lot <br />27 <br />sizes and roadway design standards of the subdivision code, established in Chapter 1103 (Design <br />28 <br />Standards)of the City Code as well as the lot size standards if the zoning code, established in <br />29 <br />§1004.10 (MDR District). The applicable standards are reviewed below. <br />30 <br />City Code §1103.04 (Easements): <br />Drainage and utility easements 12 feet in width, centered on <br />31 <br />side and rear property lines,are requiredwhere necessary. The proposed development features <br />32 <br />structures that span lot lines, a drainage and utility outlot that abuts each lot, and grading between <br />33 <br />structures to carry stormwater to the drainage easement, but the easements are notshown on the <br />34 <br />preliminary plat.Easements onrearlot linesand side lot lines,between the structuresand next to <br />35 <br />the end units,arerequired, and the applicant should continue working with Public Works <br />36 <br />Department staff to identify and provide those easements as necessary. <br />37 <br />City Code §1103.06 (Lot Standards): <br />According to this section,all lots for single-family <br />38 <br />detached dwellings must be at least 85 feet wide, 110 feet deep, and comprise at least 11,000 <br />39 <br />square feet in area. The language in this section of the Subdivision Regulations does not provide <br />40 <br />clear direction as to whether the standard applies to all zoning districts or just the LDR-1 district <br />41 <br />(which has the same lotstandards). An application of §1103.06 to all zoning districts creates the <br />42 <br />appearance of internal regulatory conflict because the zoning ordinance provides for single <br />43 <br />family lots to have minimum widths of 60 feet in LDR-2 and 40 feet in MDR which would be <br />44 <br />impossible if §1103.06 were to apply to all zoning districts. This regulatory vagueness has <br />45 <br />resulted in a record of historical precedent that is inconsistent on this issue. <br />46 <br />The proposed Lot 1 Block 2 is for a single-family detached dwelling at about 84 feet in width, <br />47 <br />103 feet in depth, and 8,650 square feet of area. If §1103.06 is applied to all districts, this <br />48 <br />proposed lot would fail to meet that Subdivision Codestandard. However, Planning Division <br />49 <br />PF15-011_RPCA_070115 <br />Page 2of 4 <br /> <br />