2015-07-01_PC_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning CommissionRegularMeeting City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive Draft Minutes–Wednesday, June 3, 2015 1.Call to Order 1 Chair Michael Boguszewski called to order the regular meeting of the Planning Commission 2 meeting at approximately6:57p.m.and reviewed its role and purpose. 3 2.Roll Call & Introduction 4 At the request of Vice Chair Boguszewski,City Planner Thomas Paschke called the Roll. 5 Members Present: Chair Michael Boguszewski;and Members Robert Murphy,James Daire, 6 Chuck Gitzen,James Bull,andDavid Stellmach 7 Members Excused: Vice Chair Shannon Cunninghamhadpreviously advised staff that she 8 may be unable to attend due to a delayed work-related meeting. 9 Staff Present: City Planner Thomas PaschkeandSenior Planner Bryan Lloyd 10 3.Reviewof Minutes 11 May 6, 2015Regular Meeting Minutes 12 MOTION 13 MemberMurphymoved, seconded by Member Bullto approve the May 6, 2015 meeting 14 minutes as presented . 15 Ayes: 6 16 Nays: 0 17 Motion carried. 18 4.Communications and Recognitions: 19 a.From the Public (Public Comment on items noton the agenda) 20 Lisa McCormick, Wheeler Street(Twin Lakes Neighborhood) 21 As a twenty-year Roseville resident, Ms. McCormick opined that she felt it was 22 appropriate to appear tonight to welcome the two new members of the Planning 23 Commission, andto expressed her appreciation of their volunteer service for the 24 contribution for the benefit of all Roseville residents and its business community. 25 Ms. McCormick noted that, one year ago tomorrow, she had first appeared before the 26 Planning Commission representing her neighbors and their request to apply conditions to 27 approval of the Interim Permit (IU) submitted by applicant Vogel Sheetmetal based on 28 their concerns with the potential of this commercial/light processing use –and their 29 experience with pastuses in adjacent properties –and its proximity to residential 30 properties.During that meeting, Ms. McCormick stated that she wasn’t sure if the 31 Planning Commission would agree with the neighborhood’s request or not, even though 32 she had pointed out that City Code offered such protections to residents as it related to 33 screening and other components. 34 Ms. McCormick expressed thanks that the Planning Commission had offered such a 35 condition as part of their recommended approval for subsequent submission and 36 approval by the City Council, even though the neighborhood was still in the process of 37 dealing with that issue a year later.Ms. McCormick expressed concern that it was still not 38 clear of the conclusion or whether the use and conditions were ready to go. 39 Ms. McCormick stated her reason for appearing before the Commission again tonight 40 was to ask them, when people came forward depending on the body to protect residents, 41 whether it appeared apparent or even doubtful in City Code, the body afford or reinforce 42 those apparent assurances.Ms. McCormick noted that, since she’d become more 43 involved with local government in Roseville, she had found that issues and responses 44 were often complaint driven for compliance, opining that she found that to set up a 45