My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:28:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2015 4:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 22, 2015 <br /> Page 10 <br /> opined this was not something one even typically thought about when purchasing <br /> a home, or the potential variables in cost, nor was it part of their normal due dili- <br /> gence in that purchase. <br /> Regarding City liability and costs, Chair Stenlund asked if it would be of value to <br /> the City Council for the PWETC to make recommendations on a potential ceiling <br /> for the cost of rehabilitation of the laterals, capping the cost for homeowners and <br /> the point the City should or could step in to share those costs. <br /> City Councilmembers supported that suggested option. <br /> Councilmember Willmus expressed appreciation already for this additional per- <br /> spective from the PWETC, particularly preventative measures. Councilmember <br /> Willmus suggested additional consideration should be discussed about potential <br /> steps the City can take as laterals are repaired to make sure City inspectors are re- <br /> viewing and monitoring those new lines from a basic perspective to ensure the <br /> longevity of laterals, and avoid added future expenses as part of preventative ef- <br /> forts. <br /> Pavement Management Plan (PMP)/Delamination of Streets/Sealcoating/Mill and <br /> Overlay/Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Ratings <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed her hope that any future PWETC fieldtrip <br /> would include monitoring and following-up on the delamination issue and re- <br /> search on the latest thoughts and/or technologies to address that issue. <br /> Mayor Roe agreed with concerns of the PWETC on potential impacts to streets <br /> with delamination and deferral of sealcoating that may have long-term effects on <br /> the PCI. Mayor Roe suggested different index standards may be needed in the fu- <br /> ture to address those correlated costs, while maintaining a balance. As part of that <br /> review by the PWETC and future recommendation to the City Council, Mayor <br /> Roe suggested their review of the City's current assessment policy based on those <br /> funding challenges going forward and whether changes were needed in that policy <br /> that may include revised cost-sharing calculations for those benefitting from street <br /> improvements. <br /> Pathway Master Plan Implementation <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted apparent issues among individual PWETC mem- <br /> bers during their last ranking of the Pathway Master Plan, and no standard criteria <br /> in their individual scoring exercises. Councilmember Willmus suggested that the <br /> PWETC's first step be to develop such a common set of scoring criteria for their <br /> next review and ranking exercise, opining that would be most beneficial to the <br /> commission and the community. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte reported on her research of potential grant monies for <br /> sidewalks through the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP). Since the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.