My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:28:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2015 4:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 22,2015 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Capital Improvement Program (CIP)/Role of the PWEC for Equipment Replace- <br /> ment <br /> Councilmember Laliberte encouraged the PWETC to work with staff to identify <br /> acceptable standards and capital improvement program (CIP) funding for street <br /> improvement projects (e.g. suggestions for those accepted standards, timelines, <br /> and funding) toward matching those efforts on a consistent basis. <br /> Regarding the role of the PWETC in equipment replacement, Councilmember Et- <br /> ten suggested that staff may already have a cycle in place based on industry <br /> standards, but agreed that the PWETC may wish to review that schedule of re- <br /> placement while recognizing staff's rationale in the cycle for replacement. How- <br /> ever, Councilmember Etten suggested the PWETC's recommendations in ad- <br /> dressing the PMP schedule, and PCI cost issues long-term would be beneficial to <br /> the City Council. <br /> Draft Neighborhood Organized Trash Collection Guide <br /> Mayor Roe noted he had seen the original draft in the PWETC meeting packet, <br /> and noted the revisions and improvements made to it, which he found to be on the <br /> right track. Mayor Roe sought input from his colleagues as to their preference for <br /> the next step: whether to seek public feedback at this time or bring it forward for <br /> action. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated her understanding was that this version was made <br /> available by the PWETC for discussion tonight; and noted there had no public <br /> comment up to this point. If the item was placed on a future City Council agenda <br /> item for potential action, Councilmember Laliberte opined that it would provide <br /> for public comment at that point. Councilmember Laliberte stated that she had <br /> several minor technical items that she would review with the PWETC or Public <br /> Works Director Marc Culver. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Chair Stenlund confirmed that, from the PWETC's <br /> perspective, the guide was ready for submission to the City Council. <br /> If the items mentioned by Councilmember Laliberte were policy related, Mayor <br /> Roe suggested it wait for City Council discussion and consideration. <br /> General Individual Comments <br /> As part of their field trips and from an operational standpoint, Councilmember <br /> McGehee suggested the PWETC recommend ways to beautify public boulevards, <br /> open spaces and rights-of-way that didn't require such intensive care (e.g. hand <br /> mowing)by installing more natural areas where applicable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.