My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:28:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2015 4:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kari Collins <br /> From: noreply@civicplus.com <br /> Sent: Monday,June 22, 2015 12:58 PM <br /> To: *RVCouncil; Kari Collins; Pat Trudgeon <br /> Subject: Online Form Submittal:Contact City Council <br /> Contact City Council <br /> Subject Twin Lakes redevelopment area <br /> Name: Kathleen Erickson <br /> Address: 1790 Centennial Drive <br /> City: Roseville <br /> State: MN <br /> Zip: 55113 <br /> How would you prefer to Email <br /> be contacted? Remember <br /> to fill in the <br /> corresponding contact <br /> information. <br /> Email Address: kathyercksnaol.com <br /> Phone Number: 651-636-9573 <br /> Please Share Your At this evening's meeting the Council will be dealing with <br /> Comment, Question or permitted commercial uses and height restrictions in the Twin <br /> Concern Lakes redevelopment area. My concern is that, to my <br /> knowledge, the Council has not addressed the preferences of <br /> Twin Lakes residents regarding both of these aspects of the <br /> proposed zoning code changes. Both the survey formulated by <br /> the community development department, as well as a petition <br /> signed by over 80 people who live (and vote) in this community <br /> provided data that directly references proposed zoning <br /> restrictions. I didn't file a "Freedom of Information" request but I <br /> believe that most respondents prefer NO 24-hour operations <br /> and a height restriction consistant with other structures in the <br /> area--no more than 2 stories, especially those facilities directly <br /> abutting residential property. There is an overwhelming feeling <br /> among residents that higher structures (over 2 stories) should <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.