My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0723_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0723_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2015 9:01:10 AM
Creation date
7/16/2015 3:28:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Exhibit A <br />6 PROPOSAL <br />� Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) proposes to demolish the decommissioned <br />8 fire station and replat the property into 18 lots far development of one-family, attached and <br />g detached townhomes. The proposed preliminary plat documentation is included with this report <br />� o as Attachment C. <br />� � When exercising the so-called "quasi judicial" autharity on a plat request, the role of the City is <br />� 2 to determine the facts associated with a particular request and apply those facts to the legal <br />� 3 standards contained in the ordinance and relevant state law. In general, if the facts indicate the <br />�4� application meets the relevant legal standards and will not compromise the public health, safety <br />� 5 and general welfare, then the applicant is likely entitled to the approval. The City is, however, <br />� 6 able to add conditions to a plat approval to ensure that the likely impacts to parks, schools, roads, <br />� � storm sewers, and other public infrastructure on and around the subject property are adequately <br />18 addressed. Subdivisions may also be modified to promote the public health, safety, and general <br />19 welfare, and to provide for the orderly, economic, and safe development of land, and to promote <br />2o housing affordability for all levels. <br />2� An applicant seeking approval of a plat of this size is required to hold an open house meeting to <br />22 inform the surrounding property owners and other interested individuals of the proposal, to <br />23 answer questions, and to solicit feedback. The open house for this application was held on May <br />24 14, 2015; the brief summary of the open house meeting provided by the applicant is included <br />25 with this staff report as Attachment D. <br />26 PRELIMINARY PLAT ANALYSIS <br />2� As a preliminary plat of a residential subdivision, the proposal is subject to the minimum lot <br />28 sizes and roadway design standards of the subdivision code, established in Chapter 1103 (Design <br />2g Standards) of the City Code as well as the ]ot size standards if the zoning code, established in <br />30 § 1004.10 (MDR District). The applicable standards are reviewed below. <br />31 City Code §1103.04 (Easements): Drainage and utility easements 12 feet in width, centered on <br />32 side and rear property lines, are required where necessary. The proposed development features <br />33 structures that span lot lines, a drainage and utility outlot that abuts each lot, and grading between <br />34 structures to carry storm water to the drainage easement, but the easements are not shown on the <br />35 preliminary plat. Easements on rear lot lines and side lot lines, between the structures and next to <br />36 the end units, are required, and the applicant should continue working with Public Works <br />37 Department staff to identify and provide those easements as necessary. <br />38 City Code §ll03.06 (Lot Standards): According to this section, all lots for single-family <br />39 detached dwellings must be at least 85 feet wide, 110 feet deep, and comprise at least 11,000 <br />4o square feet in area. The language in this section of the Subdivision Regulations does not provide <br />4� clear direction as to whether the standard applies to all zoning districts ar just the LDR-1 district <br />42 (which has the same lot standards). An application of § 1103.06 to all zoning districts creates the <br />43 appearance of internal regulatory conflict because the zoning ordinance provides for single <br />44 family lots to have minimum widths of 60 feet in LDR-2 and 40 feet in MDR which would be <br />45 impossible if § 1103.06 were to apply to all zoning districts. This regulatory vagueness has <br />46 resulted in a record of historical precedent that is inconsistent on this issue. <br />4� The proposed Lot 1 Block 2 is for a single-family detached dwelling at about 84 feet in width, <br />48 103 feet in depth, and 8,650 square feet of area. If §1103.06 is applied to all districts, this <br />�G proposed lot would fail to meet that Subdivision Code standard. However, Planning Division <br />PF15-011 RPCA 070115 <br />Pagea�eo�f`�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.