Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 6, 2015 <br /> Page 18 <br /> Chair Boguszewski opined that that statement from Councilmember Willmus in <br /> itself was helpful for him. <br /> Councilmember Etten concurred with the comments of Councilmember Willmus; <br /> opining that there was no specific value range, but intended as a concept in look- <br /> ing at the next level of housing stock to retain residents moving up form their ex- <br /> isting housing unit within Roseville versus them feeling the need to relocate to <br /> another community if that housing stock was not available in Roseville. Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten opined it was sometimes difficult to find that quality of housing, <br /> and used as an example the Josephine Heights/Pulte Homes addition as serving as <br /> a huge boon to that effort in keeping those families in Roseville. <br /> Chair Boguszewski expressed his fear as developers hear about that desire, they <br /> automatically set that as their asking price when the actual value of the home may <br /> not be worth that amount; and questioned if developers may attempt to skew their <br /> price points to get more sympathy from the City Council and/or staff for their par- <br /> ticular project. <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that the market itself should take care of that. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted the ongoing and huge need, as recognized by the <br /> HRA and City Council, for single-level homes under $350,000 accessible for el- <br /> derly residents, sustaining that housing unit stock without exclusively encourag- <br /> ing the higher-end housing stock. <br /> Chair Boguszewski agreed that the free market had its own way to address hous- <br /> ing values; and expressed appreciation for Councilmember Etten's comments. <br /> Based on her personal perspective, Vice Chair Cunningham stated how she strug- <br /> gled with developers coming in with homes that are more in the higher range of <br /> $650,000; and her difficulty in considering those as move-up housing when con- <br /> sidering the financial status of her own family and her friends, who were unable <br /> to afford that price point, even though they may be at the point of considering <br /> "move-up"housing as their next step. <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed that it was beyond his personal financial status as <br /> well; and considered the range of$350,000 to $450,000 more of an appropriate <br /> range for move-up housing rather than any higher than that. Councilmember Et- <br /> ten echoed the comments of Chair Boguszewski in developers and/or staff coming <br /> forward with their proposals stating they are in line with City Council goals; and <br /> thanked the commission for considering this as part of their concerns. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte concurred with the comments of Councilmember Etten, <br /> opining that it was premature of the Commission to factor that price point into an- <br /> ything they were reviewing. Councilmember Laliberte noted the housing and re- <br /> development segment of the priority planning by the City Council had been kept <br />