Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 6,2015 <br /> Page 26 <br /> standing by the public in understanding the rezoning concept through use of a <br /> PUD; and special regulations available in code and accessible to all. Mr. Gozola <br /> further opined that by controlling things via zoning, it provided the City Council <br /> with greater authority to make changes in the future rather than using the Condi- <br /> tional Use approach for a one-time situation and setting conditions that hopefully <br /> didn't miss any important issue during that process. Mr. Gozola advised that the <br /> PUD provided the City the ability to zone by right versus discretionary zoning; <br /> and provided more assurance and specificity for a developer that a good end <br /> product would be achieved. <br /> Mr. Gozola reviewed other considerations, such as where to allow PUD's; how <br /> and why to allow them; and the main goals desired by the City in using PUD's <br /> and specific benefits to focus on. Mr. Gozola sought input on the current back- <br /> ground and project understanding shown on pages 2 —4 of Attachment B. <br /> Councilmember Willmus, with concurrence by Mayor Roe, stated he would not <br /> agree with a PUD only being tied to a subdivision process only; but would look at <br /> applicability beyond just subdivisions. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that Mr. Gozola's presentation slides #25 and #26 <br /> concisely stated his thoughts on PUD's. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated there should be no limit on where a PUD should <br /> be; advised that she was not a fan of Conditional Use permits; and liked the sus- <br /> tainability and stormwater management aspects; and supported structured parking <br /> as incentives. <br /> To add to what was already stated, Mayor Roe opined that the PUD process <br /> should not be unrestricted as to what could be donebut more specific as to the lim- <br /> its and what can happen. Mayor Roe stated he was not supportive of a PUD ap- <br /> proval based on who was sitting at the City Council dais rather than having a con- <br /> sistent policy for a developer to follow versus doing whatever they wanted to do. <br /> Mayor Roe spoke in support of standards and parameters that outlived a sitting <br /> City Council to avoid potential arbitrary issues or concerns. Mayor Roe opined <br /> that a perceived problem with the old PUD's was that basically anything could be <br /> proposed with majority support of the City Council. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated her biggest concern with the old PUD was the <br /> lack of protection for underlying zoning as implemented and without a public en- <br /> gagement piece. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred that the public engagement piece was missing in most de- <br /> velopment activity at that time.Councilmember McGehee recognized and agreed <br />