My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_10169
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
10xxx
>
10100
>
res_10169
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:42:25 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 11:06:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
10169
Resolution Title
Approving an 18 Foot Variance to Section 1016.22C3 of the Roseville City Code for Jim Badzinski, 385 South Owasso Boulevard (PF 3540)." Adjustments noting 12' x 16' deck
Resolution Date Passed
12/15/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />WHEREAS, the proposal by Mr. Badzinski meets the first two criteria listed under Section <br />1016.22C3, the proposal is unable to meet the requirements of the third; specifically, a 15% <br />encroachment would only allow a legal encroachment of 5-1/2 feet further into the bluff impact <br />zone; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br />Badzinski request on December 3,2003, recommending (6-1) approval of a 18 foot VARIANCE <br />to Section 10 16.22C3 of the Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and <br />conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated December 3, 2003; <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to APPROVE <br />an 18 foot VARIANCE to Section 1016.22C3 of the Roseville City Code for Jim Badzinski, 381 <br />South Owasso Boulevard, subject to the following conditions; <br /> <br />a. The deck being a maximum size of 12 feet by 16 feet. <br /> <br />b. The property owner locating and identifying in the field the top of bluff on the <br />parcel for use by the City in determining the required setback. <br /> <br />c. The deck having a minimum setback of 12 feet from the top of bluff. <br /> <br />d. The deck having a minimum setback of 36 feet from the ordinary high watermark. <br /> <br />e. The deck must remain an open-air deck - in the future no enclosure of this deck <br />as a screen porch or expanded living area to the principal structure will be <br />permitted. <br /> <br />f. Shrubs and perennials must be planted between the bluff and the deck to screen <br />the deck and provide a visual enhancement. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Kough and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Kough, <br />Maschka, Klausing, Schroeder, Kysylyczyn <br /> <br />and the following voted against: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.