My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-08-05_PC_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Agendas
>
2015-08-05_PC_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2015 8:54:01 AM
Creation date
8/4/2015 8:53:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning CommissionMeeting <br />Minutes –Wednesday, July 1, 2015 <br />Page 10 <br />to read: “…headlights...and light emanating from other structures on the site <br />452 <br />related to drive-throughs…” <br />453 <br />Ayes:6 <br />454 <br />Nays: 0 <br />455 <br />Abstentions: 1 (Daire) <br />456 <br />Motion carried. <br />457 <br />Chair Boguszewski noted that this item is tentatively scheduled for consideration and <br />458 <br />action by the City Council at their July 20, 2015 meeting. <br />459 <br />b.PLANNING FILE No. 15-011 <br />460 <br />Request by Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) for approval of a <br />461 <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT for properties addressed as 2325 and 2335 Dale Street, and <br />462 <br />657, 661, 667, and 675 Cope Street <br />463 <br />Chair Boguszewski opened the public hearing for Planning File 15-011 at 8:07p.m. <br />464 <br />Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd briefly summarized this re-plat, approved in different form <br />465 <br />approximately one year ago; and now revised from 25 to 18 units.Mr. Lloyd advised that <br />466 <br />the GMHC proposes to demolish the decommissioned fire station and replat into 18 lots <br />467 <br />for development of one-family, attached and detached townhomes (Attachment C). <br />468 <br />Mr. Lloyd advised that rezoning had been accomplished with the previous preliminary plat <br />469 <br />submission; and noted that staff had received no additional public comment since the <br />470 <br />previous review and recent open house.Mr. Lloyd advised that staff recommended <br />471 <br />approval as conditioned and detailed in the staff report dated July 1, 2015. <br />472 <br />At the request of Member Gitzen, Mr. Lloyd confirmed that no easements were required <br />473 <br />along the street; nor vacation of any existing utility easements; and additional Dale Street <br />474 <br />right-of-way addressed by the existing Metropolitan Council’s easement. <br />475 <br />As indicated in the tree preservation plan provided in materials, Mr. Lloyd advised that <br />476 <br />the City of Roseville was now contracting with S & S Tree Services for planning review <br />477 <br />and field monitoring for tree protection and construction activities; with representatives <br />478 <br />available in tonight’s audience.Mr. Lloyd advised that most trees onthe site would be <br />479 <br />removed other than a handful if at all possible and as identified on the survey; and <br />480 <br />subject to tree replacement per City Code. <br />481 <br />Chair Boguszewski noted the open house meeting notes from May 14, 2015 addressed <br />482 <br />some concerns about a privacy fence or natural buffers to screen this more densely <br />483 <br />occupied mini-community; but noted that did not appear as a condition of the Preliminary <br />484 <br />Plat, and questioned if that should be addressed as a condition or would be <br />485 <br />accomplished in some other way. <br />486 <br />Mr.Paschke advised that it was not part of this request specific to dividing and replatting <br />487 <br />property; but recognized all were amenable to providing screening between this dense <br />488 <br />development and the rest of the neighborhood. <br />489 <br />Mr. Bilotta advised that this project was a coordinated project done in cooperation with <br />490 <br />the GMAC; and for anyone with concerns with site development issues, suggested they <br />491 <br />e-mail those comments to staff and suggest any mitigations they’d like to see as staff <br />492 <br />reviewed and analyzed the final project and other applicable code requirements as part of <br />493 <br />the approval process. <br />494 <br />Chair Boguszewski asked that that provision be entered and noted as an area of <br />495 <br />concern, as addressed all along by the Planning Commission in past presentations; and <br />496 <br />the Commission’s desire to protect the culture and feel of the existing neighborhood <br />497 <br />adjacent to this development, by providing a protective barrier.Chair Boguszewski asked <br />498 <br />that staff ensure that request remain part of the discussion process moving forward even <br />499 <br />though not part of formal plat approval. <br />500 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.