2015-08-05_PC_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning CommissionRegularMeeting City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive Draft Minutes–Wednesday, July 1, 2015 1.Call to Order 1 Chair Michael Boguszewski called to order the regular meeting of the Planning Commission 2 meeting at approximately6:30p.m.and reviewed the role and purpose of the Planning 3 Commission. 4 2.Roll Call & Introduction 5 At the request of Chair Boguszewski,City Planner Thomas Paschke called the Roll. 6 Members Present: Chair Michael Boguszewski;Vice Chair Shannon Cunningham; and 7 Members Robert Murphy,James Daire,Chuck Gitzen,James Bull,and 8 David Stellmach 9 Staff Present: Community Development Director Paul Bilotta,City Planner Thomas 10 PaschkeandSenior Planner Bryan Lloyd 11 3.Reviewof Minutes 12 June 3, 2015Regular Meeting Minutes 13 MOTION 14 MemberMurphymoved, seconded by Member Bullto approve the June 3, 2015 meeting 15 minutes as presented . 16 Ayes: 6 17 Nays: 0 18 Abstentions: 1 (Cunningham) 19 Motion carried. 20 4.Communications and Recognitions: 21 a.From the Public (Public Comment on items noton the agenda) 22 Lisa McCormick, Wheeler Street 23 Ms. McCormick stated her interest in briefly following up regarding her comments at the 24 last meeting, specifically regarding an Interim Use (IU) Permit issued last year and 25 conditions applied to that IU.Ms. McCormick addressed her preference that a timeline be 26 established to meet those conditions, via a specific clause, prior to occupancy.Ms. 27 McCormick stated she was unaware of whether or not a plan had been submitted to meet 28 conditions applied to the specific IU she was referencing, or if any alternative plan had 29 been submitted since the previous Planning Commission meeting.Unless weather- 30 related or other extenuating circumstances are found, Ms. McCormick opined conditions 31 should be met prior to occupancy, or a formal extension was issued by the Planning 32 Department.Ms. McCormick further opined that the delay in this case was the applicant’s 33 delay in getting financing to remodel the building. 34 At the request of Member Daire, Ms. McCormick identified the project she was 35 referencing as the Vogel Interim Permit project.However, Ms. McCormick opined it 36 should be applicable to any project, for conditions part of planning approval versus 37 waiting until everything else is accomplished.Ms. McCormick further opined that this 38 particular case provided a good example; and a provisional certificate of occupancy 39 should apply, since she was not aware the conditions of the IU had been met or any 40 subsequent plans submitted to meet those conditions. 41 Ms. McCormick clarified that he intentin attending and commenting at last month’s 42 Planning Commission meeting was to thank the Planning Commission for applying 43 conditions to the Vogel IU to protect adjacent residents. Ms. McCormick opined that there 44 were similar situations, and she was confident businesses typically took the attitude that 45 they wanted to be good corporate neighbors to adjacent residential properties.However, 46 Ms. McCormick opined that if the City of Roseville adopted a policy for stakeholders 47