Laserfiche WebLink
competitors. Member Cihacek questioned if there should be required language in <br />the guide related to those individual contract and a non-binding clause regarding <br />the pricing, depending on the number of residents signing up for that service. <br />Mr. Culver clarified that the language was specific for individual homeowners <br />and would not be a collective contract unless through a homeowner's association <br />or other legal entity, as per draft language. <br />Member Cihacek opined that, from his perspective, the draft language sounded <br />very contractual if it was intended only as an informational piece; and also noted <br />that there was no right of cancellation clause included, and questioned if this was <br />intended as an organization and free representation. <br />Member Wozniak stated that, it was his understanding that this voluntary <br />neighborhood collection effort would essentially provide that some haulers would <br />create a contract through a business relationship with an entire block and/or <br />neighborhood as applicable. <br />Member Cihacek opined that, while the volume per route increases, pricing was <br />not binding, and for informational purposes, he found language important to avoid <br />potential deceptive interpretation, and therefore changing language to be more <br />representative of information versus the contractual language in this current draft <br />guide. Since this is only supposed to provide a guide for the process or BMP's <br />and the City wasn't contracting for anything, Member Cihacek opined that he <br />found the language complex as currently written. <br />Member Wozniak agreed with the complexity of the draft language, but also <br />suggesting backing up further, opining that he didn't anticipate many haulers <br />responding to a written letter as proposed that was seeking specific price <br />information. <br />Members Seigler and Cihacek both opined that the response from haulers may be <br />surprising. <br />Member Wozniak opined that rather than a letter, it may be easier for residents <br />looking for information to simply make some phone calls and do an interest <br />survey to determine what's most important to those specific residents related to <br />garbage service. <br />Mr. Culver responded that, without turning this guide into an even larger <br />document, it was the intent to make this guide available as a word document for <br />editing purpose; and encouraging them to do so and based on their specific <br />interest. Mr. Culver reiterated that this guide is intended simply as a <br />recommendation, and different residents will have different opinions as to their <br />desired benefits, and therefore, it was up to them to put together a specific survey <br />letter for their neighborhood, adding language as desired. As to the earlier point <br />Page 12 of 19 <br />