Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Drake sought the experience of the PWETC related to solar gardens to -date, <br />with Chair Stenlund and Vice Chair Cihacek providing a recap of past <br />presentations, and the continued interest by Roseville residents in energy choices, <br />whether through partnering or making investments; and the full support of the <br />PWETC toward those efforts. Reports also included submission by the City for <br />grants to place solar arrays on City rooftops and those of community schools as <br />well; along with a roof -mounted photovoltaic assembly (PVA) for the City itself to <br />purchase through a phased, city -shared system; and several church groups in the <br />community making it part of their organizational efforts as well. <br />For the benefit of newer commissioners, Mr. Drake provided a basic overview of <br />solar gardens, potential players involved in a solar garden project, how it worked <br />with Xcel Energy Programs and a third party operator primarily running the solar <br />garden with the utility approving the garden, tracking energy production and <br />providing credit for subscribers. <br />Mr. Drake reviewed drivers behind solar gardens; 2013 policy enabling Xcel <br />Energy's community solar garden, federal investment tax credits available at 30% <br />through 2016 and then falling to 10% in 2017 and impacting subscription rates, and <br />customer/community member demand potential. Mr. Drake advised that no <br />projects had yet been approved in Minnesota, with a hearing scheduled in the next <br />few days at the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), with one of the engineering <br />questions being how much solar the energy grid can handle, and once the limit was <br />reached, latecomers would be stuck with the cost to upgrade the grid, with those <br />costs very unrealistic for most participants. <br />Discussion included how many and the varying sizes of projects and project <br />partners involved. <br />Mr. Drake offered the option for the City to participate in a joint solicitation for the <br />RFP process as part of a subscriber collaborative, with the Metropolitan Council <br />publishing the RFP for solar garden subscriptions, and Hennepin County's legal <br />team drafting and approving the document, thereby creating a Joint Powers <br />Agreement (JPA) for any governmental agency to sign on to and buy off that <br />Metropolitan Council process. Mr. Drake noted that the City of Minneapolis and <br />Ramsey County provided the technical expertise, and CERT's role is to manage the <br />process itself. <br />Mr. Drake further reviewed advantages in such a collaborative procurement process <br />for the RFP, providing better subscription pricing due to larger scale and pools <br />highest quality subscribers; faster entry into the solar garden market; reduced staff <br />time with a standard subscription agreement to developers for easier comparison; <br />and creating opportunities for local governments of all sizes and increased <br />community impacts with atwenty-five year contract. <br />Page 4 of 16 <br />