My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0810_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0810_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2015 10:01:25 AM
Creation date
8/6/2015 9:57:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 22, 2015 <br />Page 15 <br />Regarding the KOI to increase volunteer opportunities, Councilmember Laliberte <br />opined that the target goal to simply increase volunteer opportunities by 5% didn't <br />necessarily translate into engagement. <br />Councilmember Laliberte opined that the KOI of improving participation by un- <br />der-represented populations in Roseville and target of engaging three new seg- <br />ments of the community, while appreciated, also did not mean engagement. <br />Councilmember Laliberte questioned if any of the targets or strategic initiatives as <br />proposed actually got at what was needed or what the City Council hoped to ac- <br />complish. <br />Housin� and Redevelopment <br />Councilmember Laliberte opined that this section needed more work by the City <br />Council as a group, since it involved bigger issues and involved multiple depart- <br />ments, commissions, community stakeholders and others. <br />Councilmember Laliberte opined that the KOI of SE Roseville should be a priori- <br />ty for everyone, but suggested more progress could be made if that priority re- <br />mained open, and the who, what and when was better defined. <br />Regarding Twin Lakes, Councilmember Laliberte opined that there remained <br />more work to do, and a clear priority should be for the City to define that work, <br />the steps and processes to achieve it, and goals at the end of the process. <br />Regarding move-up-housing, Councilmember Laliberte agreed that it could be an <br />initiative, but since the City didn't own the land, further discussion was needed <br />about what was possible, what the City Council needed from staff and advisory <br />commissions, and then set targets that could be realistically achieved. <br />Regarding the value of residential housing, Councilmember Laliberte suggested <br />mare discussion about the specifics of that section and proposed targets as cur- <br />rently outlined. <br />Effective Governance <br />Councilmember Laliberte suggested striking this strategic priarity completely, <br />opining that it involved individual leadership and actions speal�ing louder than <br />words from each person. Councilmember Laliberte opined that the proposed tar- <br />gets and strategic initiatives didn't serve to resolve any particular item; and rec- <br />ognized that involving the community may mean issues take ]onger to bring to <br />fruition. As far as the process transparency KOI, Councilmember Laliberte <br />agreed with the concept, but since staff and the CEC had already been tasked to <br />pursue that continuum, no new document was needed. <br />Specific to the KOI of respectful interaction of the leadership team, Councilmem- <br />ber Laliberte further opined that this was up to each individual and that there was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.