Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment B <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 22, 2015 <br />Page 25 <br />well as tonight's discussion. However, Councilmember Etten opined that he was <br />still not ready to let go of the third piece of the document; and therefore offered a <br />friendly amendment to include a strategic priority for "cultural change" and how <br />best to communicate and provide information as a City. <br />Etten moved, Roe seconded, an amendment to include a third category entitled <br />"Community Outreach/Communication," and including process discussion from <br />the current "Effective Governance" priority for process transparency and other in- <br />dicators (KOI's) involving participation of other areas from the current "Civic <br />Engagement" category; and those areas that fall into the CEC realm for further re- <br />finement. <br />To clarify the amendment, Mayor Roe reworded it as intended to add a third pri- <br />ority entitled, "Community Outreach/Communication," incorporating the process <br />transparency KOI category from "Effective Governance," and participation by <br />underrepresented populations KOI category as part of "Civic Engagement" at a <br />minimum. <br />Councilmember Laliberte expressed her interest in working more closely with cit- <br />izen advisory commissions on guiding principles to use in working on priorities, <br />not as a checklist but guiding those things not being tasked to advisory commis- <br />sions. <br />Councilmember McGehee spoke in opposition to the amendment, agreeing with <br />Councilmember Laliberte that the original motion presented a mare manageable <br />and cleaner approach, while still allowing inclusion of those other items as ad- <br />dressed by Councilmember Laliberte. Councilmember McGehee expressed her <br />preference for a clean, comprehensive document. <br />Councilmember Etten stated his rationale for including the amendment was based <br />on the reasons outlined by Councilmember McGehee; opining that it included in <br />the document it allowed for regular updates and tracking versus a checklist. <br />Councilmember Willmus stated his concern was even in providing charges to citi- <br />zen advisory commissions, as a body the CEC incorporated a good group of peo- <br />ple that he would like to allow an opportunity to take this document and see what <br />they returned with versus the City Council now establishing its own KOI and tar- <br />gets. Councilmember Willmus suggested allowing the CEC to bring it back; and <br />therefore would not support the friendly amendment at this time; concurring with <br />the two items in the original motion as moved by Councilmembers Laliberte and <br />McGehee, and including the four goals stated by Councilmember McGehee and <br />embedded in each goal. <br />Mayor Roe spoke in support of the amendment, stating that the priority of this <br />City Council is to improve communications through the process of transparency, <br />