My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0817_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0817_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2015 4:21:06 PM
Creation date
8/14/2015 12:00:58 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
267
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment D <br />levies, the most direct mechanism for recovery of capital expenditures is through utility <br />rates, as Roseville does currently. <br />2. Rates should be designed to promote an efficient use of resources. <br />This principle reflects the goal that rates should send an appropriate price signal to <br />customers by reflecting the cost of serving them. Stated another way, an efficient allocation <br />of resources takes place when the value a customer places on a product is equal to the cost <br />of producing the product.3 This concept is generally referred to as "cost-based" rates. <br />There are several issues to consider, which I address separately below: <br />• not recovering costs incurred by each rate class from that rate class (inter-class <br />subsidies); <br />• the rate design of the base charge and the variable rate; and <br />• recovering fixed costs through the base charge versus the tax levy. <br />a. Inter-class subsidies <br />An inter-class subsidy occurs when the revenue collected from one class of customers fails <br />to recover the cost of serving those customers, and the difference is made up by over- <br />recovering costs from other customer classes.4 To send the proper price signal, it is <br />appropriate to minimize inter-class subsidies within a utility rate structure. However, in the <br />interest of fairness and affordability, it is not unprecedented to have large, non-residential <br />customer classes subsidize smaller and residential classes. <br />From discussions with Finance Director Miller and review of his rate analysis, it is my <br />understanding that Roseville's residential class water usage is subsidized by approximately <br />seven percentage points. That is to say that the single-family residential class water usage <br />revenues account for approximately 44 percent of total revenues collected, yet actual usage <br />is approximately 51 percent of City-wide water usage.5 The situation is similar for sanitary <br />sewer usage with a subsidy of approximately 14 percentage points. <br />Regarding inter-class subsidies related to base charges for water, it appears that the <br />residential class is subsidized by approximately nine percentage points. However, the <br />residential base charge for sanitary sewer subsidizes the multi-family and non-residential <br />classes by three percentage points. When extrapolated over the actual revenue dollars, the <br />effect is basically a net wash.6 <br />For context, the current percentage shifts for water and sanitary sewer usage results in a <br />$2.77 per residential customer shift to multi-family and non-residential customers on a <br />3 Id. Page 3. <br />4 Page 10, Peirce Direct Testimony, filed June 5, 2014, in Xcel Electric's most recent rate case in Docket No. <br />E002/G R-13-868. <br />5 See attachment for calculations. These numbers are based on 2015 utility rate analysis are meant to be <br />illustritive, as they will change from year to year. <br />6 Id. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.