Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting ofthe City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 13th day of September 2004, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Maschka, Ihlan, Kough, Schroeder, Klausing <br />and the following were absent: None <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 10241 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />MAP DESIGNATION FROM SHOPPING CENTER (SC) & LIMITED BUSINESS (LB) TO <br />BUSINESS (B) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT <br />1515 COUNTY ROAD B & 2194 STATE FARM ROAD (PF3591). <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a public hearing held on August 4, 2004, pertaining <br />to the request they received from Target Corporation for a Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment <br />on property commonly known as 1515 County Road B and 2194 State Farm Road; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment requires a map <br />designation change from Shopping Center (SC) and Limited Business (LB) to Business (B); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said property is legally described as: <br /> <br />Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1 Roseville Target <br /> <br />WHEREAS, after required public hearings, the Roseville Planning Commission recommended <br />approval (6-0) of the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, indicating support for the <br />redevelopment; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council at their meeting of September 13, 2004, was presented <br />with the project report and recommendation from the Planning Commission and from the Community <br />Development Staff regarding the subject request; and <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council to hereby approve the <br />amendment to the Comprehensive Plan from Shopping Center (SC) and Limited Business (LB) to <br />Business (B), subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />a. The review and comments ofthe Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Klausing <br />and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Maschka, Ihlan, Kough, <br />Schroeder, Klausing <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />