Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Bilotta asked the Commission & staff about access opportunities, easement possibilities, ie. <br />greenway corridor. <br /> <br /> <br />Brokke mentioned that engaging a planning professional to work with citizens and staff to <br />look at access and opportunities in the area. <br /> <br /> <br />O’Brien commented on how things seem to be moving fast, what is the timeline at Twin <br />Lakes? <br /> <br />Adjacent lands to the park are about 2 years out and are need in some site clean-up <br />o <br />and requiring more time. Current interests are a bit removed from the park area but <br />will eventually move closer to park. <br /> <br />Brokke commented how the regulating map helps us by identifying different needs <br />o <br />with different developments. <br /> <br />Twin Lakes Public Comment: <br /> <br /> <br />Annette Phillips voiced her interest in keeping the area well buffered. The Twin Lakes area is <br />a real jewel, the warehouses are not visually beautiful, but they are quiet. There are concerns <br />about potential parking lots very close to the park and encourage efforts to keep the park <br />pristine and safe. <br /> <br /> <br />Carol Tanning is concerned about the safety of walkers in the area. Carol feels the <br />development has the possibility of opening up properties to unsafe situations and is <br />concerned about those potential problems that could come in with further development. She <br />urges the City to keep the area safe. <br /> <br /> <br />Lacy commented that the lake and the area around the lake are her favorite part of living in <br />the area. There is lots of wild life and she is advocating for conserving the area. She is also <br />concerned about safety at the south side of lake. <br /> <br /> <br />Ron Tanning mentioned this is a park in need of access for everyone. Tanning also <br />mentioned the need for lighting and minimizing a closed in feeling. <br /> <br /> FOLLOW UP ON JOINT MEETING WITH THE CITY COUNCIL <br />5. <br />Brokke highlighted meeting minutes and council interests. <br /> <br /> <br />Golf Course operations review <br /> <br /> <br />Park Dedication Fees <br /> <br />Policy on use of Park Dedication Fees <br />o <br /> <br />Capital Items <br /> <br />Acquisitions <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion on Southwest Roseville properties <br /> <br /> <br />Fees: resident and non-resident <br /> <br />Extensive discussion on Park Dedication fees and the possibility of considering a policy that <br />provides more direction on the use of park dedication fees. <br /> <br /> UPDATE ON CEDARHOLM GOLF COURSE REVIEW <br />6. <br />Phil, Jerry & Dave have been working with staff to review Golf Course operations and learn more <br />about the enterprise fund. <br /> <br />Jerry briefed the commission on recent discussions and spoke to the workings of an enterprise fund. <br />An enterprise fund is required to cover all direct and in-direct costs plus capital items. Unfortunately, <br />the golf course will not be able to maintain the enterprise fund status going into the future, it is not <br /> <br /> <br />