Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, August 5, 2015 <br />Page 5 <br />shallow pools – one smaller and one larger – to store and cleanse water, and allowing for 197 <br />a beautiful buffer along the property. 198 <br />At the request of Member Daire, Mr. Mastey advised that depending on the depth of the 199 <br />ponds, it was yet to be determined if a safety fence would be needed, but anticipated 200 <br />shallower depths and pond design for a sub-drainage system underneath to avoid any 201 <br />safety challenges for children in the school or church. Mr. Mastey reiterated that modeling 202 <br />was still incomplete as he and Mr. Johnson worked to calibrate the amount of water and 203 <br />time needed to avoid any significant standing water as the site is sculpted and modeled. 204 <br />Mr. Mastey noted there was a proposed trail to be installed to cut through the native 205 <br />prairie wetland area as part of the pond design. 206 <br />Member Daire stated that he saw this as a creative solution for the ponding and runoff 207 <br />problem in this area; but also noted his concerns and potential unintended consequences 208 <br />if it created any safety challenges for children at the school and/or church. 209 <br />Public Comment 210 <br />Chair Boguszewski closed the public hearing at 7:06 p.m.; no one spoke for or against. 211 <br />Member Murphy noted for the record that one Councilmember and three Planning 212 <br />Commissioners had attended the open house for this project; and expressed his 213 <br />appreciation to the applicant, City staff and the watershed district for their efforts in 214 <br />addressing concerns raised by the neighbors at that meeting. 215 <br />Member Bull, based on his attendance at the open house and viewing of the facility, 216 <br />stated that it was a phenomenal facility, and gave no indication it was a temporary 217 <br />building. 218 <br />Chair Boguszewski agreed with his colleagues, opining that this was very well thought-219 <br />out, and created a positive rather than a negative for this neighborhood. 220 <br />MOTION 221 <br />Member Murphy moved, seconded by Member Bull to recommend to the City 222 <br />Council renewed approval of the temporary classroom facility as an INTERIM USE 223 <br />at 2131 Fairview Avenue; based on the comments, findings, and conditions 224 <br />contained the project report dated August 5, 2015. 225 <br />Ayes: 7 226 <br />Nays: 0 227 <br />Motion carried. 228 <br />This case is tentatively scheduled to come before the City Council at their August 24, 229 <br />2015 meeting. 230 <br />At the request of Member Daire, Mr. Paschke reviewed the process for this application 231 <br />moving forward. Mr. Paschke noted that typically, stormwater projects didn’t come before 232 <br />the Planning Commission, and if significant issues were involved, would go directly to the 233 <br />City Council for approval or denial. 234 <br />Mr. Paschke offered to send the Commission detailed plans at their request, with 235 <br />Member Daire expressed appreciation for that offer, noting it was turning out to be an 236 <br />interesting planning project. 237 <br />c. PLANNING FILE No. 15-015 238 <br />Request by United Properties for approval of a PRELIMINARY PLAT of land in the 239 <br />southeast corner of Lexington Avenue and Woodhill Drive 240 <br />Chair Boguszewski opened the public hearing for Planning File 15-015 at 7:08 p.m. 241 <br />Member Murphy advised Chair Boguszewski that he would be recusing himself from this 242 <br />discussion in lieu of any potential conflict of interest, as he was a member of the Board of 243 <br />Directors for a Cooperative that was still doing business with United Properties. Member 244