Laserfiche WebLink
Variance Board Meeting <br />City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Draft Minutes – Wednesday, July 1, 2015 – 5:30 p.m. <br />1. Call to Order 1 <br />Chair Murphy called to order the Variance Board meeting at approximately 5:30 p.m. and 2 <br />reviewed the role and purpose of the Variance Board. 3 <br />2. Roll Call & Introductions 4 <br />At the request of Member Murphy, City Planner Thomas Paschke called the Roll. 5 <br />Members Present: Chair Robert Murphy, Vice Chair James Daire, and Commissioner Chuck 6 <br />Gitzen 7 <br />Others Present: Alternate Variance Board Member Michael Boguszewski 8 <br />Staff Present: City Planner Thomas Paschke and Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd 9 <br />3. Review of Minutes 10 <br />MOTION 11 <br />Member Daire moved, seconded by Member Gitzen to approve meeting minutes of June 3, 12 <br />2015 as presented. 13 <br />Ayes: 3 14 <br />Nays: 0 15 <br />Motion carried. 16 <br />4. Public Hearings 17 <br />Chair Murphy reviewed the protocol for public hearings and subsequent process. 18 <br />a. PLANNING FILE No. 15-013 19 <br />Request by North American Banking, owner of the property at 2230 Albert Street, 20 <br />for a variance to Roseville City Code, Section 1005.02.F (Materials), for a greater 21 <br />use of metal siding on a building exterior 22 <br />Chair Murphy opened the public hearing at approximately 5:32 p.m. 23 <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke summarized the request for this case as detailed in the 24 <br />project report dated July 1, 2015 and attachments. Mr. Paschke reviewed various code 25 <br />requirements, requested variances, and staff’s analysis of those specifics as a 26 <br />prerequisite for approval. 27 <br />Mr. Paschke noted the Bank is planning a complete and major remodeling of the 28 <br />Roseville branch, originally constructed as a U. S. Post Office in 1965, later remodeled 29 <br />into a law firm, and then morphing into the current bank use in 1998. Mr. Paschke 30 <br />advised that the proposed metal siding material for the exterior dos not conform to 31 <br />current zoning code. Mr. Paschke noted the unique aspects of this older building and 32 <br />need to update the exterior and challenges in modifying materials for a more modern 33 <br />appeal, while still complementing the existing 1965 brick work that will remain, and 34 <br />provide balance and some uniformity on all sides of the building. 35 <br />Member Daire noted last month’s variance request by Pizza Lucé and this request 36 <br />involved metal siding to be architecturally pleasing that had been discouraged in the past 37 <br />to avoid the use of corrugated type material for siding. Member Daire suggested an 38 <br />amendment to zoning code text, it may serve to allow material review as an 39 <br />administrative variance versus formal hearing before the Variance Board. 40 <br />Mr. Paschke reported that such a text revision was on staff’s radar for future approval by 41 <br />the Planning Commission to amend code as industry standards have changed since 42 <br />adopting the zoning code with materials now more aesthetically pleasing even beyond 43 <br />this type of material. 44