CC_Minutes_2015_0824 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, August 24, 2015 Page 41 Mr. Gozola advised that the language had been drafted to provide for potential vacationing or unavailability of the forester, at which time someone else can be assigned that role provide they had the same qualifications. Councilmember McGehee questioned the difference in protecting roots through a drip line versus measuring the diameter at breast height of a tree, suggesting a simple calculation for residents was preferred. Councilmember McGehee clari- fied that she wasn't so much concerned in cost savings for developers,but for res- idents without access to or understanding a CADD system, the ordinance needed to provide an easy-to-use system that worked for all trees. Mr. Gozola provided rationale for choosing the "root protection zone" language as it was actually easier to measure in the CADD system without having to assess each and every tree for the drip line based on a particular species. Mr. Gozola ad- vised that this provided for an average methodology and provided overall cost savings for applicants — whether residents or developers, since they would both need to hire a survey done to locate trees. Councilmember McGehee further addressed her appreciation of including pruning based on timing if not allowing for wound dressing. Councilmember McGehee opined that it appeared that this draft exempted a lot of areas for ponding, rights-of-ways, and other areas that may need included; and asked if Mr. Gozola was aware of any other communities that may have addressed that concern. Councilmember McGehee noted problems in potential cutting of trees during the height of nesting that may be in the way, but endangering indi- vidual wildlife habitats. With few exceptions, Mr. Gozola opined that most cities would consider such a requirement to be onerous for residents in general. Sambatek Memorandum, Section I. Allowable Tree Removal, (page 4) Councilmember Etten expressed concern in tree removal process versus results, suggesting it may be just the opposite of what he intended. Councilmember Etten clarified that he was addressing developments clear cutting parcels with little tree return, dramatically affecting neighborhoods and ecosystems; and represented his reaction to several developments where this had happened within the last few years, where significant growth trees were gone and sticks planted. Councilmem- ber Etten noted this was a very important purpose aspect for him in the ordinance. General Observations Councilmember Etten expressed appreciation for a number of the pieces included in this draft, including the numbering systems to determine a clear way forward.