My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1005_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1005_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2015 4:07:06 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 2:35:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 10, 2015 <br />Page 44 <br />actually went out and sought where critical issues stood in their cominunity, opin- <br />ing that was something rarely done in Roseville in the broader sense. <br />City Attorney Gaughan stated that the Parks & Recreation Commission had no in- <br />terest in further hashing out this issue with the many other things they have on <br />their plate. Regarding what may trigger a subsequent action, Mr. Gaughan admit� <br />ted that neither he nor City Manager Trudgeon claimed to be experts in this area; <br />and asked the City Council for their input on what sort of trigger or metric they <br />preferred, or details on how they wanted that section of the ordinance to worlc. <br />Councilmember Laliberte suggested something about Department of Natural Re- <br />sources (DNR) counts, with Councilmember in agreement and also recognizing <br />counts froin Ramsey County. <br />Mayor Roe noted his discussion of triggers at the previous meeting, and suggested <br />if neighboring cities were participating with Ramsey County, the City of Rose- <br />ville should do so since it made no sense not to participate. <br />Councilmeinber McGehee noted that Ramsey County had not asked the City of <br />Roseville to participate and since many of its residents have asked not to partici- <br />pate, the City should listen to its constituents. <br />Mayor Roe clarified that just because people had differing opinions, it didn't <br />mean that their City Council and its staff were not listening, suggesting that <br />Councilmember McGehee was well aware of that. <br />Councilmember Laliberte questioned if there was a representative at Ramsey <br />County who could talk to the City Council and how Roseville could factor into <br />their efforts. <br />Mayor Roe noted that this had been part of the research of the Parks & Recreation <br />Commission. <br />City Manager Trudgeon opined that tonight's discussion and ongoing dissention <br />should allow an understanding by the City Council and the public of staff's di- <br />lemma in drafting this ordinance. For further direction, Mr. Trudgeon clarified <br />that the consensus was a desire to maintain a wildlife feeding ban in some form <br />and beyond deer; to draft a wildlife management plan with specific triggers identi- <br />fied; and provide next steps, including the hunting option contained in the draft <br />ordinance. <br />Mayor Roe noted that this was at least the direction from three Councilmembers. <br />City Manager Trudgeon apologized while recognizing that this effort seemed to <br />keep missing the mark, and was aware of the community's frustrations, but also <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.