Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />HRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Tuesday, August 18, 2015 <br />Page 7 <br />under the Ciry Manager's control, except you're really not since the HRA has that controL Mr. <br />Bilotta opined that this simply broke down the structure. <br />Chair Maschka noted the only other option at this point was to discontinue the agreement. <br />Majerus clarified that motion before the Board at this time was to accept or reject this draft <br />services agreement; not to say something else may not come along in the future, but for <br />tonight, this is the status. <br />Chair Maschka noted that it was now August and the 2015 services agreement had yet to be <br />approved, indicating to him that the current system must work. While not disagreeing that <br />some valid issues haven't been brought up, Chair Maschka stated his main concern was that <br />the HRA and Ciry Council could retain and continue to build on their cooperative relationship. <br />Member Wall clarified that no one felt otherwise, but keeping those interests in line, in sync <br />and of a cooperative nature, the HRA Board couldn't be a puppet of the Ciry Council either <br />when holding the responsibiliry to use its good judgment and act upon its fiduciary <br />responsibiliry. Under those circumstances, Member Wall opined that the Board had no choice <br />but to have the executive director's position one of independent support and not have that <br />position clouded with the ciry's bureaucracy or government. <br />Member Etten clarified that he was not in favor of the HRA hiring its own executive director, <br />since there were obvious financial and professional benefits under this services agreement. <br />Member Etten opined that if Ms. Kelsey were to map out her time in a detailed fortnat, there <br />would be many indications of the give and take of her time and others collaborating in HRA <br />efforts. Member Etten further opined that the HRA was different than the RVA in being <br />funded through general t�es. From his perspective, Member Etten opined that there had to be <br />some middle ground, and suggested this draft agreement get feedback from the Ciry Council, <br />the Ciry Attorney as well as the HRA Attorney to create a fortnalized way to address roles for <br />both parties. <br />Specific to this draft of the services agreement in Section 2(Executive Director), Member <br />Etten suggested the addition of "annuaP' related to the Ciry Manager's sole discretion in <br />nominating a candidate, providing that additional checkpoint in line with HRA by-laws. On a <br />related note, if it was the consensus of the Board, Member Etten suggested the by-laws could <br />be amended to change "shalP' from "may" or some appropriate language providing steps to <br />help the HRA's situation. <br />Member Masche concurred, opining that Member Etten's comments and suggestions were <br />well-stated. Member Masche opined that there was an agreement to be had, but he didn't feel <br />comfortable with this draft or that it reflected the desire for a cooperative attitude between the <br />Ciry Council and HRA Board. Member Masche noted that the executive director was the most <br />important person perfortning the job of the HRA, and a document better reflecting tonight's <br />discussion was needed. While recognizing that it more than time that an agreement be drafted <br />and accepted, Member Masche agreed that this draft needed more work. <br />After voting on the motion currently on the table, Member Majerus proposed getting the HRA <br />and Ciry Attorneys together to draft a proposal to come before the body in a certain number of <br />days yet to be detertnined based on their legal expertise. <br />Member Wall opined that the HRA needed to provide a framework to the attorneys on those <br />areas of this draft services agreement that the Board found acceptable and those it did not in <br />order for them to understand where the Board was coming from. Member Wall suggested <br />meeting with those legal representatives and having that discussion prior to another document <br />coming back before the Board. Also, Member Wall noted the need for feedback from the City <br />