My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-08-05_PC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
2015-08-05_PC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2015 11:30:36 AM
Creation date
10/16/2015 11:30:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Regular Meeting <br />City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Minutes – Wednesday, August 5, 2015 <br /> <br />1. Call to Order <br />1 <br />Chair Michael Boguszewski called to order the regular meeting of the Planning Commission <br />2 <br />meeting at approximately 6:30 p.m. and reviewed the role and purpose of the Planning <br />3 <br />Commission. <br />4 <br />2. Roll Call & Introduction <br />5 <br />At the request of Chair Boguszewski, City Planner Thomas Paschke called the Roll. <br />6 <br />Members Present: <br /> Chair Michael Boguszewski; Vice Chair Shannon Cunningham; and <br />7 <br />Members James Daire, Robert Murphy, Chuck Gitzen, David Stellmach, <br />8 <br />and James Bull <br />9 <br />Staff Present: <br /> Community Development Director Paul Bilotta, City Planner Thomas <br />10 <br />Paschke, and Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd <br />11 <br />3. Review of Minutes: July 1, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes <br />12 <br />MOTION <br />13 <br />Member Daire moved, seconded by Member Murphy to approve the July 1, 2015 meeting <br />14 <br />minutes as presented with minor subsequent typo and grammatical corrections from <br />15 <br />Members Daire and Murphy submitted to staff <br />. <br />16 <br />Ayes: 7 <br />17 <br />Nays: 0 <br />18 <br />Motion carried. <br />19 <br />4. Communications and Recognitions: <br />20 <br />a. From the Public (Public Comment on items not on the agenda) <br />21 <br />None. <br />22 <br />b. From the Commission or Staff <br />23 <br />For information purposes, City Planner Paschke announced that the September Planning <br />24 <br />Commission docket currently had eight items; and given the extensive number of items, <br />25 <br />suggested moving the meeting up from 6:30 to 6:00 p.m. <br />26 <br />At the request of Chair Boguszewski, Mr. Paschke advised that, to-date there were no <br />27 <br />variance submittals requiring a Variance Board meeting to be held on that evening. <br />28 <br />By consensus of the body, Chair Boguszewski concurred with staff’s suggestion to move <br />29 <br />the meeting up to 6:00 p.m.; asking that Mr. Paschke follow-up via e-mail before the <br />30 <br />meeting with the Commission as to the refined schedule as cases continued to come <br />31 <br />forward or be deferred as applicable. Chair Boguszewski further asked that staff make <br />32 <br />sure the public is made of aware of those time changes as well; with Mr. Paschke <br />33 <br />advising that the usual published, posted and mailed notice procedure would be followed, <br />34 <br />and website updated to ensure public awareness. <br />35 <br />Member Bull asked that agenda packet materials be distributed to commissioners as <br />36 <br />soon as possible given the number of cases, and allowing sufficient review before the <br />37 <br />meeting. <br />38 <br />Mr. Paschke noted that staff would try to accommodate that request as much as possible; <br />39 <br />but application materials may not be completed until the Thursday or Friday immediately <br />40 <br />before the Wednesday meeting. <br />41 <br />Member Murphy asked for a staff update regarding the Vogel Property and expiration of <br />42 <br />the Interim Use permit. <br />43 <br />Mr. Paschke clarified that the Interim Use did not expire for a few years, but suggested <br />44 <br />Member Murphy may be referring to the Conditional Occupancy Permit that would be <br />45 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.