My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-08-05_PC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
2015-08-05_PC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2015 11:30:36 AM
Creation date
10/16/2015 11:30:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, August 5, 2015 <br />Page 5 <br />shallow pools – one smaller and one larger – to store and cleanse water, and allowing for <br />197 <br />a beautiful buffer along the property. <br />198 <br />At the request of Member Daire, Mr. Mastey advised that depending on the depth of the <br />199 <br />ponds, it was yet to be determined if a safety fence would be needed, but anticipated <br />200 <br />shallower depths and pond design for a sub-drainage system underneath to avoid any <br />201 <br />safety challenges for children in the school or church. Mr. Mastey reiterated that modeling <br />202 <br />was still incomplete as he and Mr. Johnson worked to calibrate the amount of water and <br />203 <br />time needed to avoid any significant standing water as the site is sculpted and modeled. <br />204 <br />Mr. Mastey noted there was a proposed trail to be installed to cut through the native <br />205 <br />prairie wetland area as part of the pond design. <br />206 <br />Member Daire stated that he saw this as a creative solution for the ponding and runoff <br />207 <br />problem in this area; but also noted his concerns and potential unintended consequences <br />208 <br />if it created any safety challenges for children at the school and/or church. <br />209 <br />Public Comment <br />210 <br />Chair Boguszewski closed the public hearing at 7:06 p.m.; no one spoke for or against. <br />211 <br />Member Murphy noted for the record that one Councilmember and three Planning <br />212 <br />Commissioners had attended the open house for this project; and expressed his <br />213 <br />appreciation to the applicant, City staff and the watershed district for their efforts in <br />214 <br />addressing concerns raised by the neighbors at that meeting. <br />215 <br />Member Bull, based on his attendance at the open house and viewing of the facility, <br />216 <br />stated that it was a phenomenal facility, and gave no indication it was a temporary <br />217 <br />building. <br />218 <br />Chair Boguszewski agreed with his colleagues, opining that this was very well thought- <br />219 <br />out, and created a positive rather than a negative for this neighborhood. <br />220 <br />MOTION <br />221 <br />Member Murphy moved, seconded by Member Bull to recommend to the City <br />222 <br />Council renewed approval of the temporary classroom facility as an INTERIM USE <br />223 <br />at 2131 Fairview Avenue; based on the comments, findings, and conditions <br />224 <br />contained the project report dated August 5, 2015. <br />225 <br />Ayes: 7 <br />226 <br />Nays: 0 <br />227 <br />Motion carried. <br />228 <br />This case is tentatively scheduled to come before the City Council at their August 24, <br />229 <br />2015 meeting. <br />230 <br />At the request of Member Daire, Mr. Paschke reviewed the process for this application <br />231 <br />moving forward. Mr. Paschke noted that typically, stormwater projects didn’t come before <br />232 <br />the Planning Commission, and if significant issues were involved, would go directly to the <br />233 <br />City Council for approval or denial. <br />234 <br />Mr. Paschke offered to send the Commission detailed plans at their request, with <br />235 <br />Member Daire expressed appreciation for that offer, noting it was turning out to be an <br />236 <br />interesting planning project. <br />237 <br />c. PLANNING FILE No. 15-015 <br />238 <br />Request by United Properties for approval of a PRELIMINARY PLAT of land in the <br />239 <br />southeast corner of Lexington Avenue and Woodhill Drive <br />240 <br />Chair Boguszewski opened the public hearing for Planning File 15-015 at 7:08 p.m. <br />241 <br />Member Murphy advised Chair Boguszewski that he would be recusing himself from this <br />242 <br />discussion in lieu of any potential conflict of interest, as he was a member of the Board of <br />243 <br />Directors for a Cooperative that was still doing business with United Properties. Member <br />244 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.