My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1019_AmendedCCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1019_AmendedCCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 3:10:27 PM
Creation date
10/19/2015 9:59:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 22, 2015 <br />Page 27 <br />Mayor Roe asked if this only got us back to the same current issue if citizen advi- <br />sory commissions were part of that discussion, questioning if the City Council <br />needed to figure it out now or have it as part of the next step in the conversation. <br />Next Steps <br />Councilmember McGehee yielded to Councilmember Laliberte on the work ses- <br />sion, taking those two main items and KOI, with each individual coming up with <br />a list of what they would like to see for the direction from input received from cit- <br />izen advisory commissions and sending that input to the City Manager for dissem- <br />ination, with the subsequent meeting to determine consensus. After that, Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee suggested that document be forwarded to commissions for <br />their feedback and responses to the Ciry Council as to how they envision imple- <br />menting it. <br />Councilmember Willmus agreed with that concept, recognizing the timing of the <br />next HRA meeting and upcoming City Council work session, allowing the benefit <br />of their background discussions at that time. <br />Councilmember Laliberte suggested the work session allow for a review of targets <br />to determine which should be kept or tweaked; and then publicize who should be <br />involved and how involved, with the public and commissioners — as private citi- <br />zens — all having time to speak. <br />Mayor Roe noted this would serve in identifying targets as well as stakeholders. <br />Councilmember Laliberte clarified this was not to say it would remain static but <br />would start with an initial group and add to it moving forward. <br />Councilmember McGehee opined that she didn'� see it as limiting if specific tar- <br />gets were identified, with the potential for short-term task forces and speciiic di- <br />rection to interested community members. <br />Mayor Roe noted the City Council anticipated staff input as well during their re- <br />view of the document, and as part of the public and City Council discussions at <br />that July 13, 2015 Worksession. <br />McGehee moved to keep her four goals in mind as guiding principles: educational <br />outreach, process, policy and transparency as part of this activity. <br />Mayor Roe directed staff to include that list on the bottom of the document; and <br />was approved without objection. <br />b. Authorize Interfund Transfer — Dale Street Development <br />As detailed in the RCA, Community Development Director Paul Bilotta summa- <br />rized this request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.