Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A <br />1 Extract of the September 28, 2015 Roseville City Council Meeting Minutes <br />2 Consider Approval of a Preliminary Plat at Rosedale Center <br />3 Prior to staff s presentation, Mayor Roe clarified that the action sought of the City Council <br />4 tonight was only for PRELIMINARY PLAT approval, with the PUD amendment that had been <br />5 included in the Planning Commission's review, public hearing and their recommendation for <br />6 approval would come before the City Council at a future date and not part of tonight's requested <br />7 action. <br />8 City Planner Paschke confirmed this approval process, anticipating the PUD Agreement <br />9 amendment will come before the City Council sometime in October. <br />10 Mr. Paschke briefly reviewed this request as detailed in the RCA dated September 28, 2015, and <br />11 outlined on the displayed map (Attachment C). Mr. Paschke advised that the Planning <br />12 Commission unanimously recommended approval as conditioned, concurring with staff s <br />13 recommendation for approval. <br />14 As he had discussed with Acting City Manager Bilotta earlier today, Councilmember Willmus <br />15 asked if the applicable property owners were co-applicants of this Preliminary Plat, seeking <br />16 clarification of the wording in the RCA. <br />17 Mr. Paschke confirmed that co-applicant status, advising that J. C. Penney had provided staff <br />18 with a letter of support, the former Compass Realty entity no longer in existence, with other sub- <br />19 entities signing off and becoming part of the permanent record as recorded with Ramsey County. <br />20 If the City Council approves this preliminary plat, City Attorney Gaughan suggested adding a <br />21 condition that its approval be contingent upon approval of approved amendment to PUD <br />22 Agreement # 3608. <br />23 Applicant Representative Bill Mosten, Senior VP of Retail with Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) <br />24 Mr. Mosten concurred with the summarization by City Planner Paschke, stating their <br />25 development team's availability in the audience for questions if needed. Mr. Mosten expressed <br />26 their firm's appreciation for the City's support of Rosedale Center over the years and expressed <br />27 their excitement in moving forward into the future with this project. <br />28 Mayor Roe noted the significantly reduced square footage available to the fourth anchor tenant <br />29 with this proposal (Attachment C); further noting that it created some interesting lot lines on the <br />30 site. <br />31 Mr. Mosten responded affirmatively, noting that it made for the cleanest way to replat the site <br />32 without causing further complications with the parlcing structure and other amenities of the site. <br />33 In general, Councilmember McGehee expressed her interest in seeing all the parking lots on the <br />34 Rosedale Center site more amenable to pedestrian movement from one portion of the site to <br />35 another; asking the applicant to take that into consideration in their planning. Councilmember <br />36 McGehee referenced recent improvements by the City with trails and pathways within the City <br />37 and improvements to pedestrian access from neighborhoods surrounding Rosedale Center, but <br />38 her concern in pedestrians then having to dodge traffic once on the site. Councilmember <br />39 McGehee asked the applicant to work with staff on that concern as part of their PUD agreement <br />40 negotiations. <br />