My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1116_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1116_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 3:07:16 PM
Creation date
11/12/2015 4:19:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment C <br />43 Mr. Reeder noted other ideas in communities, and software applications to establish a baseline, such as <br />44 by addressing canopy coverage vacillating, to consider where to go in the future. <br />45 Commissioner Daire spoke in support of that approach. <br />46 Chair Boguszewski opined that underpinning the whole concept, the key seemed to allow part of the <br />47 comprehensive plan to involve a quantitative plan by holding a broader public discourse around the <br />48 entire concept and not just the city deciding they have authority of trees in a private yard, but agreeing <br />49 to a good, long-term goal for the entire community. Chair Boguszewski opined that it certainly made <br />50 things more palatable rather than his initial concerns that a tree ordinance was within the realm of <br />51 governinent overreach. <br />52 Mr. Gozola continued with examples from other communities, including addressing either mechanism <br />53 during development and/ar construction (Maple Grove), limiting tree preservation to a subdivision <br />54 versus zoning ordinance (Plymouth), or cash in lieu of tree removal or restoration (Minnestrista). <br />55 As outlined in Attachment A of Sambatek's memorandum dated July 6, 2015, Mr. Gozola reviewed his <br />56 current project understanding and observations of the community's current status. <br />57 Chair Boguszewski noted the points discussing flexibility on the part of the community and the <br />58 overarching goal of why to keep or increase trees as part of the educational piece as well. <br />59 Mayor Roe noted the need to justify any city ordinance with some kind of policy. <br />60 While hearing a lot about tree preservation from Planning Commission discussions, Councilmember <br />61 Willmus stated his observation of their deliberations was based on how they were interpreting the letter <br />62 of the law with the zoning code and comprehensive plan. However, Councilmember Willmus noted <br />63 that the Tree Board, as a role of the Parks & Recreation Commission, had not yet been heard from, and <br />64 expressed his desire to make sure they weighed in on this discussion as a vital part of the equation. <br />65 During his eight year tenure with the City, City Manager Trudgeon advised that he was not aware of <br />66 the Tree Board being involved much or being aware of their actual role. However, going forward, Mr. <br />67 Trudgeon advised that he would incorporate them into these discussions. <br />68 Councilmember McGehee opined that Public Works was also part of the equation, as this involved the <br />69 entire city, whether private trees, right-of-way or boulevard trees, or those located in parks or general <br />70 common spaces. Councilmember McGehee opined that some of the issues of importance to her <br />71 included grouping trees or massing them to identify certain areas; recognizing the flyway migratory <br />72 areas; retaining vegetation in natural areas; diversity with boulevard tree planning, as well as its <br />73 spacing for maintenance and to ensure tree survival, and how to address use of underground <br />74 stormwater storage in irrigating trees. Councilmember McGehee also noted her concerns heard from <br />75 residents in their lack of confidence with tree inspections requiring the expensive removal of <br />76 apparently diseased trees, and subsequent discovery when analyzed by the U of MN that they were not <br />77 actually diseased at all. Councilmember McGehee expressed her lack of support for planting <br />78 elsewhere in lieu of the immediate development area, opining that provided nothing but wasteland in <br />79 some areas and overcrowding in other areas. Councilmember McGehee further noted a recent <br />80 newspaper article about one old growth tree species (the state's largest Butternut tree) in the <br />81 community that needed to be preserved. <br />82 Councilmember Willmus agreed with Councilmember McGehee in the need to call attention to old <br />83 growth trees, with much of the tree planning occurring as the community grew from farmland to <br />84 residential during the 1950's through 1970's; and impressive growth achieved without any actual tree <br />85 preservation plan in place. During the Pulte Housing Development project, Councilmember Willmus <br />86 admitted it had served as a real eye opener for the City Council in clear-cutting that area for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.