My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_1019
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_1019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 1:37:01 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 4:04:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/19/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 19, 2015 <br />Page 25 <br />sustainable. While recognizing that a lot of amenities had been recently added <br />that people enjoy and encouraged people to locate in Roseville, Councilmember <br />McGehee opined that without creating a huge tax burden, the City would not sup- <br />port those amenities long-term, and further opined that more apartments wouldn't <br />achieve that goal. Councilmember McGehee opined that the City had a lot of af- <br />fordable housing now and she was not in that marlcet, but instead supported eco- <br />nomic development to improve housing stock with Roseville 98% developeci and <br />unable to malce any major shifts in existing housing stock. <br />Councihnember Laliberte suggested moving off the focus of move up housing <br />units and simply to list "economic" in the heading. However, Councilmember <br />Laliberte questioned if by doing so it missed the commercial/industrial coinponent <br />that needed to be factored in or if the economic development piece only applied in <br />Twin Lakes and SE Roseville. <br />Councilmember McGehee noted the need for living wage jobs in all areas. <br />Mayor Roe questioned where other opportunities were in Roseville for commer- <br />cial/industrial or corporate focus beyond Twin Lakes and SE Roseville unless <br />soinething was already zoned accordingly. <br />Councilmeinber Etten addressed discussions of the HRA over the last few months <br />as part of their plan to refocus on economic development efforts, with the first <br />step being to help existing businesses through development of a loan program to <br />encourage their expansion or to iinprove their exterior fa�ade as an outcome or <br />goal. Since soine of those HRA prograins are already in place or in the planning <br />process, Councilmeinber Etten suggested that the City Council look at what had <br />been produced and refine it as needed. While supporting a category for economic <br />development, Councilmember Etten noted that soine of that work had already <br />been put in place. <br />Mayor Roe clarified with staff that rehabilitation of facilities was inchided under <br />the HRA's business rehabilitation program. <br />Under the 2416 timeline, with the City Council looking for a inore robust eco- <br />nomic developinent program as their focus area, Mr. Bilotta noted that some of <br />that would involve the HRA and what they had been doing, with the City Council <br />in a position to keep or discard some of those efforts depending on which way <br />they decided to move going forward, which should be decided by year-end 2015. <br />Mr. Bilotta suggested talking through those existing programs during 2016 and <br />then going into the 2017 budget cycle those ideas could be put in place, restruc- <br />turing accomplished, and other goals that would involve considerable work. IDur- <br />ing the interim, Mr. Bilotta noted that low hanging fruit would continue to be ad- <br />dressed before then as a normal part of operations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.