Laserfiche WebLink
31 OutFront has had discussions with Metro Transit about selling the shelters to them in the event <br />32 the City did not want to purchase them. Staff has followed up on this and learned that Metro <br />ss Transit does not have any interest in purchasing the shelters. <br />sa Metro Transit has faced considerable criticism and scrutiny over the past few years about where <br />35 transit shelters have been installed in the past. The criticism centers around the fact that many of <br />ss the locations with shelters located in more affluent areas of the Metro had lower ridership than <br />37 bus stops within low income areas without shelters. Metro Transit has since adopted more <br />sa detailed guidance on where shelters will be installed (see Attachment C which was printed from <br />ss the Metro Transit web site). <br />ao Given this, there is no guarantee that if the existing shelters are removed that we could expect to <br />at see Metro Transit installed shelters at these locations in the future. Additionally, even if Metro <br />42 Transit were to someday install some shelters in the City, they currently do not provide snow <br />as removal or trash service at their shelter locations which would be a dramatic difference in the <br />as level of service currently experienced at our existing shelters. <br />45 Please also note the 20 shelters referenced above and shown on the attached map include two <br />as shelters at Snelling Ave and County Road B. Those shelters have been removed in anticipation of <br />47 the new enhanced stations that are being installed for the A Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) <br />as service along Snelling Ave that will be in operation next year. Construction on those stations just <br />as recently started. If the franchise agreement had remained active, the City would have worked <br />50 with the PWET Commission and the City Council to identify two new locations for those <br />51 shelters. Currently the shelters are being stored in the Public Works Maintenance Yard. <br />52 DISCUSSION <br />53 Staff will present this information along with some more detailed information on this program <br />54 and the possible outcomes at the Council meeting. We are seeking direction from the City <br />55 Council on what to do with the shelters given that the franchise arrangement no longer seems <br />56 sustainable. To review, staff is presenting two options to consider: <br />57 1. Allow the franchise agreement with OutFront Media to expire and, as per the terms of the <br />58 agreement, require them to remove the shelters and restore the sites to the previous <br />59 condition or a negotiated final condition (i.e. leave the concrete pads in place). <br />so 2. Purchase the shelters from OutFront Media and leave the shelters in place. In order to <br />61 fund the maintenance of the shelters release a Request for Proposals to sell advertising on <br />62 the shelters and collect revenue from those advertisement sales. The advertisement sales <br />ss would also be used to offset the purchase price over time. <br />sa Staff has contacted a separate advertisement firm to discuss their interest in taking over the <br />65 franchise agreement. This firm, Intersection, which recently won the contract to provide <br />ss advertisements on Metro Transit vehicles and stations, indicated they would not be interested in <br />67 assuming the same ownership and maintenance responsibilities but would be interested in selling <br />sa the ad space and sharing the revenues. OutFront Media also indicated they would be interested in <br />ss that service. Therefore staff anticipates we would receive at least two proposals if we were to <br />70 issue an RFP. <br />71 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS <br />72 Based on the Council's direction to staff, the City may incur a cost of $20,000 to purchase the <br />73 transit shelters. It is recommended that the Engineering Services fund be used to fund the <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />