My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1130_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1130_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 3:05:31 PM
Creation date
11/25/2015 3:11:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department Approval <br />�. �: � <br />Item Description <br />�� <br />.r- <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 11 /3 0/15 <br />Item No.: ] 3.b <br />City Manager Approval <br />Consider Adopting the 2016 Utility Rate Adjustments <br />BACKGROUND <br />� Over the past several months, City Staff has been reviewing the City's utilities operations to determine <br />whether customer rate adjustments are necessary for 2016. The analysis included a review of the City's <br />water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, and curbside recycling operations. <br />The information presented below includes an analysis of these operations, some historical water usage <br />information, and a series of rate comparisons with peer communities. Each of these are presented in <br />separate sections. <br />Operational Review <br />Staff's analysis of its utility operations included a review of the following: <br />0 Fixed costs including personnel, supplies and maintenance, and other costs that are generally <br />independent of the amount of water purchased or wastewater that is generated. <br />0 Tlariable costs including the purchase of water from the City of St. Paul, water treatment costs <br />paid to the Metropolitan Council, and recycling contractor costs paid to Eureka. <br />0 Capital replacement costs. <br />0 Customer counts and consumption patterns, rate structure, and rates. <br />Based on an analysis of these costs and customer consumption patterns, Staff is recommending a <br />number of fee adjustments for 2016. The need for these adjustments are presented in greater detail in <br />subsequent sections. <br />Based on Staff's recommendation, the estimated quarterly impact on a typical single-family home is <br />shown in the following table. <br />Page 1 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.